SI

TOS

aBug oŃw Tetiguab Tiend to seimijaeb edt Tavo fotJuos

aj mojavo sift box) aa9.(nu test tum e ae Xrow ɔð Juc

VIINT bna vileorto) al era (altty grote nommoɔ Jon

#

.bedrobe

of Jea at Iris end eavon a'reyoigms 18d xI

eTom on ob od even yem eña :esitub sijaamob viantbro

10,9avod and to arudiguab silt to ano no bnejde medj

neve Jud ;XTow9awon ait to stana list 8 even van sis

ni neid avoubır aasi eɗ Vilst909; ILIW NIOW 913 93

BILod Ties Jassi Je [I‡w boe emon a'tneILQ TƏN

-Je91♬ vibald to asonsdo add bns,golajola bae ynfybol

vino at ena eredw emor e mi neat 829l on ed Iftw Juem

and qu awoт3 sda BA WIuItraqua smoзelducIJ VISV B

of beaoqque at Toyoiqme erit Jent Tealɔ at mojaus

ede belttam neuw :baedaun sidativa s gulbali ni Jelaae

mojavɔ Levau erið ni vilmet a'basdawn red antot Irla

.Ied moqu Vrevsia to engija on dễ tw

on ya si arayoiqme 9:13 to yellidianoqaer edT aeynst ji lo nexed welv end'ont, Tajjai beab e angul)

a' leat tum s of moltnejd】 T9qorq gukbuloni moTÌ

oijaamob e as doendsend Tist 19d Javj od noljacube

SIOM Sxed of ybeer ayawie ons atrodigten bas ;JnAVT93

To nenj Isað tum e to Jasmdaerd elid to sotton шterBJ

10% ginsqo avoivdo aevig mojavo ent .bitdo wo as

w

*

at egøjnevbe Jeid gotatıqrva tou at ji bre enud.

999 Atosiq Lem aserqque oj afrotte ed♬ Jud :merid to mexed

of Jitguord als Jørð agaes of nevig sonenimora sɗë baz

gatisedo yď svi 4799, nistja Vilase viev neo Figli

Istolighed vino at Leva ent evenw bowergland sbiw edð

teat tum edt dant 1995 metio al Jnsmetoja ent

sild to Budsja eiT .satdo mi wel vd nebbidiol al mojaus

Leer

-

268

real slave the widening of "no puk" to include "mui tsai" appears to be a confusion of ideas amongst Europeans. The status of either is very distinct and different from

that of the other in the Chinese mind; and it would be interesting to know the grounds on which the European statement rests. There may be some forgotten edict

dealing with the question if so, it has no effect on the custom: and the only practical executive effort

towards the suppression of the system (as apart from

its abuses) that of Chan King Wa referred to later

claimed no legislative authority. It would be matter for surprise to learn that Chan had omitted such strong support for his case if it had been available.

no puk was abolished during the Empire:

-

:

·

Share This Page