contluerbly greater pensions (in cases w
where contributions have been made over
E considerable per ou prior to the ist
>
Jan, 1920) than under the
Ceylon arrangement.
(
His Cruce also proposes to send to the
Gov. of H. Kong & copy of the corres.
with the Gov. of the S. S. enclosed in
this letter inorder that the former
ingruer
By see how the question of the 8 tables
now stanus,
6. As regarus p: ragraph 4 of the
uespatch fion the Cav. of H. Kong No. 164
of the 13th April, 1921, it is proposeu
to reply that the arrangement suggested
yuricht
therein could not be accepteu
7. I am to exple in that separate
actuarial investigations into the
Malayan
anu H.Kong schemes have been
are under
Buggested because/members buyer
the impression that they are not obtaining
the full benefits which would be
justified by the ctel mortality
DRAFT.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
MINUTE.
Mr. Davis.
Sir G. Grindle.
Bir H. Read.
Sir J. Masterton Smith.
Mr. Ormsby-Gore.
Duke of Devonshire.
T.
experience of their individu 1
schears. To remeuy this, if it is
50,
440
on a strictly actuarial banis,
it will be necessary for the mort-
ality experience of the scheme in
Canin Malaya
the bulb and
H. Kong to be investigateu separ-
ately; otherwise, if the itune
schemes were investig: teu is one,
it might still be open, say, to a
H.Kong contributor to complain that
the benefits which he might legit-
imately expect are uininished by the
worse conuitions (from a health
point of view) prevailing in the
Malay Por
s. I am therefore to enquire
whether there is any doubt as to
the data available relating to
H.Kong being sufficient for the
purpose of a useful sepur te
investigation.
(Signed) H. J. READ
experience