*
.56
DOUL
.A
"ei-tw" on 26 wredd tedj zeala
14 #sapp vid mi >[^ioitto
on 17vi. Sed dramoves,
novewod you di “wing to vim ti
26110/21
Government House,
Hongkong.
1st April, 1921.
333
❤
Tryrofo5 mut
gerian mi belied han mavor, need bad roler wigo de Ba-
Tony de deeruming dari oda od komen MEN
Madiznog noirivong si druid voy mietni ot sved I waits!
„Armunnon toð elico to v[rage time
vet boeld zone do mas
- g
..DAY I
量
(.68)
Candinout (np.19 (6)
t
Sir,
I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt
of Lord Milner's despatch No. 450 dated 24th December,
1920, and to state that I concur generally in the
views expressed by Mr. Severn in his despatches No.
308 of 25th September, 1919 and confidential of the
same date with regard to the opium question.
2. Some of the points now raised by the Anti-
Opium Association show them to be singularly ill-
informed on matters of common knowledge. It may perhaps
be well for me to deal specifically with such of the
observations quoted in the Foreign Office letter of 3rd
December, 1920, as directly concern this Government:- (2) The New Territory which is apparently what the
Association means by "h-owloon" is only "a part of
China" in a geographical sense: but in any case no raw
opium whatever goes there from Hongkong.
(4) The opium farm was abolished in 1914 in Hongkong,
its place being taken by a Government monopoly.
(5) The control of morphine, etc. is probably as
strict in Hongkong as anywhere in the world.
(6) "Opium divans" were made illegal in 1909; the
number of opium shops is as low as possible, and the
retail trade in opium is most strictly controlled.
(7) The penalties for illegal possession of "kindred
drugs" are exceptionally heavy in Hongkong.
i
HRIGHT HONOURABLE,
WINSTON CHURCHILL, M.P.
& C+
&C.,
&C.
3.