188
Lrofond
332
to
„2.110 = 'vi datow^ Dino [0]
monok
„ICE(„NOTEM it?
o Aqijoka ulle øybeIroning of hatogrib me I
malisol air of bennett ba15d-apeli JS eds to reddol Tuov
MOL! #riotii medieo 109 AFF cov doidw ni
4
FUE MOAKIN
to ymo[ng mic vôni makne te moldstrogîti and waitasyo7 arod end v[get sido dend dergon aexique na bra monoh
.beyslab
ent Progra" bebradri ni "tinqui" yd dert saunter
4.
The answer to the last question makes it
clear that there is no "unfair" profit made by Chinese
officials in the sense in which you use the word, as this
Government has given no guarantee to reduce automatically its sale of opium, It may however be of interest to your Association to know that of the illicit prepared opium seized in the Colony during 1920, no less than 92.1% consist
-ed of opium which had been grown and boiled in China.
With regard to the last paragraph of your letter, I have to inform you that the provision permitting a treveller to take a small supply of opium for consumption on board ship is still in force. I cannot agree that its
rescission is necessary, or that this would have the small-
est effect in actual practice. The Dangerous Druge Act
applies of course only to the United Kingdom.
(sd.)
I am, kc.,
CLAUD SEVERN,
*
vm-qo ver To, noltedregui ser
.[
en yengren are madw) -[el ni "trado 03:
arade OCI - REI vi edendo 081 of
.S
dejrzan 10 degani u moicedroqri on si stor
edu to Froqsä lewend end to yqoo e saniono I muige [Inging no,efel not stroquê que «troqni în draus daire00′′
sway of wid to moicemelgis ne bnwo? -! [fir Pete To AC of
.93oup trov dɔidr
da neidoubNI ANT
[
bordei gaidze aktarma (nën-nib yoilog « to don dluser silt
To quiing to die mag to mod jea em 10.jqrusnoo
WTIS VOL Band gd i Jerug noidqmunnus to ¿ndeligST
od nigh visjonom Jai neyou to sɔinq gnifies semel yen al seu adi sabe [neng doid Fitzind
A
"NCER CABILL STO JO Temuanos odt
«YdTawo? Tuddra brgy
Todos „3 (cranul
Lanni tapmatt
. #
Colonial Secretary.