ESE
330
d: gear ** LI¤i krav odd tritub fetznyri
-phubu lumi strogri sɗfi vndhudo 150
rationing its export of the drug.
3.
Whether the reduction of opium revenue is in accord-
** €IÐI
*
TWİÇÜ HEITTOT
beng si Jasrom ail: voll viel not smurdar galbenjamiLG UNT
www cost no Xanda veft pedala Cad
ence with a stated policy, and, if so, in what vear
such revenue will, in accordance with present
arrangements cease?
MADH
4.
Whether there is any justification for any suggestion
that the Chinese Goverment, either Central, or
‚ndsoun AGST od „TIC) 00
1
*1 (2) Jnet
1201 Tot deg bi
bu Lanssa uu shum m PÁ
możnoll at tedd
through its Provincial Authorities, is profiting
unfairly vis-a-vis the Hongkong Government?
T
at với và 20:1 CH. VỚI Jige to meitarfox a -odrgividne
Jed and midto add no‚$15,000,000, ÞR
- $7
wit not going t
2) ener
Ligo to vigo 30 min and To?
Sternd nid* (7) Jini idete Prime 12. eberg %. SA
* monsterte win to camshmaya va ad ne primlarve siam and
AS For
PRIEVOLV
parazzia maijo to neutruber [auty grabie_J1
mad neid minors. Vt vun 12
I am further instructed by my Board to respectfully ask whether
the provision in the Opium Amendment of 1913 (paragraph 16,1) permitting passengers leaving Hongkong for any country to possess five mace of opium for every day of their proposed voyage, is still in force, and, if so, in view of the small gain to the finances of the Colony through this practice, also to its character, contrary to the terme of the Dangerous Drug
Act, whether Your Excellency will facilitate steps whereby
this provision may be struck out.
I have, &c.,
(Sd.) ARTHUR SOWERBY,
General Secretary.
-
cumin, pnroflo? (do no noittaj
fanaumoni nú er ytilest
JATETİNCO
·
made, we lo adrante une to malv mi
mde to
-Ligs to "POST Magang med of atrore to get
BLATJAN
ATAU DU VENTILAos dzał ate jyn (loyonot
- là đôi
ניו. ;