.II.T
[#YOU===LIO TABO
DOWNING STREET.
634
December, 1922.
1
**poly=I Fierä niriqnd jednald1dynas va lo and
bartijet noed wed ad fedt anteigmon ..".* Boshtet yrecof @ to
ai su dot of numed the yeg nietrwa to so1120 Ieimalan med vď
Wii (She #bro insussUPITE MAP tiw ponebzosor mi „Fa[713mg
ONE MENN (DIGI # 1% PRi end to te229Í D'WAI zamoƐ ni #ro den
„Bethalat milð soð gardenost-nabo" BAN TAZJAĮ
atrágkɔ yd Lenager; d'inmadidi kargð skolans. I ·
li bestido roum 90 IIata bur „ndari ant tus pu15298 TLoly#T
„sessou a ♬ ofni aber astmtupne svad v Ihmbi [IIw woy
,00 evalla!!
„XILES YTOV STUDY
.T
,belaglo] end rod aded? to yærdanse"-rakat
Brodwod to walof?
Dear Davison,
I have now leaked into the complaint, enclose U
in your letter of the 8th December, by Captain kasil
Taylour R.K., concerning certain pay and bonus of which
he states that he has been deprived.
7
The position is as follows. Captain Taylour
was allowed to serve in the Navy during the war on the
usual terms, 1.6, he was granted a 'Colonial allowanc8"
to make up the amount of his naval pay (without allowaI ON
to the amount of his Colonial salary - The Treasury
ruled that allowances other than those of a compensatory
character must be deducted from civil salaries in the
case of Home Civil Servants, and it was decided that
Treasury rulings in these matters should be followed in
the case of Colonial Government Officera. In this way
Captain Taylour lost his transport allowance, his de-
tached duty allowance, and his bonus (paid weekly) as
officer
W.H. DAVISON,M.P.