by Caft Taylow of
47661/1420
on £100
£100. We agreed on
both claim
from him, but only
this debt
due
aim of £2-4-6, which
the C.A. had paid him by a misunderstanding o
i
i
the rate of Admnt Won Bomer,
due to him from
BORANEKIN ON CAPTAIN TAYLOUR'S GRIEVANCES.
623
Capt.Taylour's chief complaints are as
follows:←
(1) The Chan Pui affair. In October 1910
A the shroff Vơng-diau-lha absconded with some 3,800
dollars of public money.
The Governor considered
that Capt.Taylour's supervision had not been
adequate and called upon him to pay 750 dollars,
with the afferval of the This decision of the Governo
Secretary of State at the time.
www upheld by the
Recently a
C.A.
banchal Page Cuft's Coth does not mention
any complaints about
his paint.
Marthart
Ad
the H. K. Prize Count, so that I have aft
attend the General Papus
m
that ponst.
7415
attend
Caft Zaytour has to many subjects of
complaint that it is
Such
impossible of
Jay are the three referred B. He has
been refused
There is
qu
caturvilis with in Sess.
leason why Col. Awery shot wit
see him if he is prepared to taste fent
the
Com o
:the defit cannot recommend
bishing this tale; but
in listening
Crven
any
of his case facts.
unless be produces some need
43c71f2
matter who
to atten
זי
27408)
Chinese Clerk, Chan Pui, absconded with some
30,000 dollars of Goverment money, and was
convicted.
Thereupon Capt.Taylour proceeded to
appeal against the decision taken in 1910 on the
ground that it was now clear that the fault was
that of Chan Pui. Hr.Bushe advised that the
conviction could not be regarded as a fait nouveau
undermining the action previously taken, and
Capt.Taylour was consequently informed in a letter
from this office dated the 18th of August (38526)
that the Secretary of State did not consider that
the recent conviction of Chan Pui was a fait nouveau
which would undersine the action previously taken
in his case, that sotion having been based on a lack
of supervision on his part. The letter added that
Lord Hilner did not consider that he need regard the
circumstances as having cast any slur on his
character, the notion taken having been due barely to
the fact that the Governor at that time did not
consider