!
No E
IGS
ine amolde fra IklamermeD)
LISC
ê ya badoaTib
I
R & 8. 8057/20.
Sir,
October, 1920.
252
! *.
I
1 R.
*
...
→
ร
fred de Iorit
ما
j
j
10 pre:
[I
TO DO MATO aki ni svisosu cu hela mino bjertme-no visat xo vital,35
VALË TË JET
-
+
ekaj mest bedroge nutqo NO STMOET vnd nd !w bezagmos
a rabidana od sebe (and bivore
i jintl or shop ri qataven text not? ajroqes
Τ.
1. Num scanÌJÀ ̧¡
* Fortsævtrab eat ena muiɖo
.* Pivent „8980qtuq o Mijasioa
MAT VERí no dvoranovo. els cJ
BELİRLn is stand svlag97 c♪ bala ad juan la 2bba gażydene to you as ni zonesatɛeS
.7020g Theil at 55 yas doide (20.
a. I
I am directed by the Secretary of State for India in Council to acknowledge the receipt of your letter, No. CRT.3850, dated the 22nd September, 1920,
2. The Board of Trade suggest that the system now proposed for regulating the export from the United Kingdom
of opium and similar drugs might prove suitable for adoption
by the Government of India, se regarde exports from that
country also. Mr. Montagu has no objection to transmitting
this suggestion for the consideration of the Government of
India; on the receipt of their reply, a further communication
will be made.
3. He takes, however, this opportunity to point out
that this proposal goes much further than the Hague Convention
contemplates. Exports from India are at present regulsted
according to the principles laid down by that Convention;
raw opium is not exported to countries which prohibit its entry
The Assistant Secretary,
BOARD OF TRADE.
and
Ja to 1992 schau
nitto albal
4
————