CES
ewwers of staa,eroterert
acuse of
amesa JI „Iney a edaɑdo qtro?
,080p in nodomuenos Inool rot bedraTLED JIOMA edt Jant kin yluhmu ei atasdo vtxia bas berbaudi cwd yleman Wrot has berhoud owé gainiomer odd to heawear yiriel ed yem „Juoque tot ⚫Idafievs 97a Jart adeedo
de eIdratared at Invotes 1Jiv trazeeran Elfl edt .soiton 'art mom eviewd anivių Jnemutevoð zeritis no smid yna evil to abcineq redta ti dadi asjade yleBerqxs dizertivi noisquwanoo Issol zot negu beats ateer to 19ómuni edt STACY ed of evorg vievidoaçası Alucile OBOR!! mor? drogxe To da art Tebienoo [liw Jnemurevod seengutro sdt avises018 .neiðaaup mi drome sit anisiver to y‡iliderizeh 1staini e'ytesja" ai zidovident szoled vlanibrooo!
ert ni Jnem:revo{ 9291gud109 sit donorqqs of modail Ja VILJO1092 .IM NIeal of bal ad blow nóstwj brol,xejjem
zmijaeqque te vdilideniash and cd an ewe iv a'ugadao” 10 Jimil Inunna treaerq end to neidouber a ylavoenej Imia etesto -berbasit ovit
,oje,CIA I
(68)
9. 6322/19/
નવું
30
سکوت
January, 1920.
5 Jam
240
I am directed by the Secretary of State for India in punail to seimowledge the receipt of "r. Tilley's letter no. 1:153 €
10.7. dated the 2nd December 1919, on the subject of the reposed agrement with Portugal regarding the supply of opia
"8080.
2. Mr. Wontagu agress that the allowance of 25) cheats year for local consumption, and the limit of 240 chests a year or exportation from uncao to countries which do not prohibit he importation of opium seem excessive; and he would be glad
f these amounts could se reduced. The indefinite extension of the
part business in opius from Kacao, which article 5 of the gre-ment contemplates, also appears undesirable; and it would be a consonance with the accepted policy of the Government of India
f the limits now provided for under articles 2 and 4 of the
Under Secretary of State,
FOREIGN OFFICE.
agreement