ያያ
S
Lev138
23
company aggrieved by the propoms, trumfez uppealing to the Court concerned under sub-section B(a) of Section 4 of the Gzdi-
sunee ulready refered to.
There is thus given to a Company power to demand &
brenažer, power to the soupective Megintzuza to dewind a transfer,
and dus provision in all oumen for a judicial decision,
As we have seen it is provided by Article 5 of the China (Qompanies) Order in Council. 1915, und by deation D(1) of the corresponding Hongkong Componies Ordinance of that year that in 311 muttere relating to Nangkong China Companies the jurisdiction b♫ the respective Jupreme Courts «t llongkong and Shanghai whɛll
concurrent.
It is further provided by articles 6 47 of the wider in Jouncil of 1915, and by Jections 5(2) and (3) of the ordi-
knue of 1915, that either Court way on the uppliestion of &
rty, or an its own Hotion, remit to the other Court proceedings relating to « Hongkong Jhin. Qompany, such remission being mode ja consideration of the plɛos where the principal part of such Company's business is muzzied on: provision is also thereby mɛde fe: mutual enforcement of julioiul orders made by the respective
în paragraph 10 of His Bzoellenoy's desputoh, under ansideration, he refers to the king On Company (Manghui) ~imited to which it is suid "Juch a Vorspany may be a subsidiary company belonging to a bona fide Hongkong enterprise, and the territorial
Control here may be suti «factory”.
were the matter of jurisdiution saw to be consider
fixat time, it would be
low that the