H.

9440/20

Su

300

Lofy for prulent-

thist

15

I have to.

March 1920

to inform

the question of the

you

treatment of traste. markus belonging to German sulirets

whuish

im

the

войто

have not been sold!

liquidation of everay.

the Colonies not

forressing responsible Gout

Protectorater

vested wo

of Enemary

under

General

2

but Force been the local Custodian Property

Conne

has been

Such markers will im

fall into

three classes:

(a) those belonging to Gauman

Buimo

individuals

established in

or companies

and cannying

business in Germany

but not

5.

Marks falling within the third class are in effect registered in the

names of two entities, a German individual firm or company in Germany

carrying on business as a manufacturer and a German individual firm or company in the Colony carrying on business as an agent—the mark denoting

both the manufacturer's and the agent's business. The latter business hasN presumably been liquidated and is no longer in existence. In view of the

provisions of paragraph 5 of the Annex to Article 297 of the Peace Treaty,

such marks might be retained by the Custodian, if it were desired to prevent

imports by the firm concerned into the Colony, but having regard to the general

resumption of trade between the British Empire and Germany it is considered

that it would be best to allow the mark to be restored to the German firm, with

whose business it was formerly associated.

6. In cases where it is decided to restore enemy trade marks, two

alternative courses are possible :-

(A) A General Divesting Order or Deed, leaving the various rights of

the parties to be determined hereafter in legal proceedings;

(B) the restoration of each trade mark only on special application by

the parties properly entitled to it, the transfer by the Custodian to such

parties being recorded in the Register of Trade Marks.

It seems preferable that the second of these courses should be adopted,

proof of title being called for in each case before the transfer by the Custodian

to the person claiming ownership. It does not seem necessary that a special

assignment should be made in each case, and all that would be required is that,

in each case in which the title was made to the satisfaction of the Custodian,

he should give to the Registrar of Trade Marks a written authorization to

re-enter the names of the applicants in the Register, which might be in the

following terms :—

Subject to the provisions of the Treaty of Peace, I consent to the

transfer of mark

to

the Treaty of Peace."

now standing in my name as Custodian

who has proved his title to my satisfaction under

DRAFT.

Circular

.3.

to all

ming

Coloniere ť Protectorates

(not to Tanganyik(u)

MINUTE.

Mr. Discon

qu

Mr. Burke 9/3/20

Mr.

Mr.

Grindle !!

Nir H. Lambert.

Sir H. Read.

Sir G. Fiddes.

Col. Amery.

Lord Milner".

60

008/120

0

1

ction (see minute)

v Mancer

defs requered to Tang.. Sanitoms & Topol'

Capy to to

22 March 1920. AFF?

I have the honour to be,

Sir,

Your most obedient, humble servant,

(for the Secretary of State)

L. S. AMERY.

Share This Page