?

Sov

400

135

a few years ago threats alone would have been used. This is no doubt a result of the constant fighting and disturbed

conditions in China.

4.

The repealed Ordinance was of little value in dealing with these problems and was otherwise objection- able for the reasons given in the Attorney General's report,

a copy of which was enclosed in my despatch No.213 of the

Those parts of the old Ordinance which

30th June, 1920.

were of value have been incorporated in the new.

I have the honour to be,

My Lord,

Your Lordship's most obedient,

humble servant,

7.5. Statts

Governor,&c.

(M909–11) Wt, 26589–35~50,000 TIME 18. 6, 1924 1

Share This Page