be
97
ai nesaut VÁ ZMİYAT90
!
To end I star
vinssis kad neisivene
and of seirin
JC
C
að BILL HE womanièrˆ «min"gro"
di esire 30 Print" de pas tapi." Amox nof' to
matt ni * and ni tolser vi d Njim Inah od
[,fioncob-ni
9:0
10 e noïdoe?
sub main wrop to sing and tot sabivolq
P)
. Iar Jona
alide
ex siamstd s
12,997ol ofni ɑninos „čier
ggg! end of an arendeize
.no beiT18:
tek ai void
vorfa eð af peniton foun
aran 40 wld to sorol edui wines and Tadle botme'ronni
niduita în noideerit de soalą to sanero of
snu wel nocivenę. Pimsicas" to (d 5 m) & moldoce-da
binet and yo noidenim
modle Holderctl song and ....1 » pura le avison e lo sgisper no -Treço e‡i stolno tegnspat eni?' a 10 'yaequco amido ¿moq uoh'
LAWOTĘ
r
AA
nelivetų vial to someritzˆ ACT
porradal s
grla od molant rel
titan deve calle
no yne Ve
atu
-ISUTO Azimu
M
seidenen
די
فن -
* to smoit
Brgud? and
.91iuper
ic to aferand anirebтo and
R 10
1 ynidae atelet
0
Ordinance of 1915, it is provided that:-
"In all matters relating to a Hongkong china com
pany the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court end of the Supreme Court of Hongkong shall be concurrent and the two Courts shall in all respects be suxi- liary to each other".
Sub-section 4 (a,b,c,& d) of Section 4 of the Ordinance
of 1915 provides for transfers from the Hongkong to the Shanghai
Register, and vice versa, by the respective Registrars of their
own motion. Provision is made for notices to 'Hongkong and China Companies' and 'Chine Companies' by the respective Registrars, celling upon them to show cause why a transfer should not be made, and for the submission of a written cese against such proposed
transfer.
On a company so served with notice failing to satisfy
the Registrar concerned, a month's grace is allowed before a
transfer on the official files. This month's grace is to enable
a company aggrieved by the proposed transfer appealing to the
Court concerned under sub-section 5(a) of Section 4 of the Ordin-
ance already referred to.
There is thus given to a Company power to demand a transfer, power to the respective Registrare to demand a transfer,
and due provision in all cases for a judicial decision.
As we have seen it is provided by Article 5 of the China (Companies) Order-in-Council, 1915, and by Section 5(1) of the corresponding Hongkong Companies Ordinance of that year that in
all matters relating to Hongkong China. Companies the jurisdiction of the respective Supreme Courte at Hongkong and Shanghai shall
be concurrent.
It is further provided by Articles 6 and 7 of the Order-
in-Council of 1915, and by Sections 5(2) and (3) of the Ordinance of 1915, that either Court may on the application of a party, or on its own motion, remit to the other court proceedings relating to a Hongkong China Compeny, such remission being made in consider- ation of the place where the principal part of such company's business is carried on: provision is also thereby made for mutual
enforcement