263
Jnel Beineqmoo owd eds to noidųsoze snit ddiw,si
„rona I 88 1st de „svad zsinegro) anido reddo [Is ‚od betrator
KÌ TSET) wƏn edt dziw yigmos of sqets gaided 818 10,noast
Tię Jadj moitas que add Jadd servus 1,zbaste ti sa [ionsoð
Fridine add to miedo badaiogge ed bimode namiotudo tudŠTA
edd yď no betos so bluoda .L‡I (exido) .00 opsadoT necixзMĀ
vilecitoeng Eivor ji tent saivba of Tuoned edt eved I
+
.:18qл:00
ero yo enok sd Iliw bre,snob nsed Bed doid boog and Ile obnu
asidira erit of ne emnizivong sti ti,Iconvo) ni Tet:10 wen
.wob belddis exew snido ní asinequo✪ enido to JasragENAM
+
.509
ved I
noв¤ixlik ...H .ba
.adɛnovilane OC
་
„Jise ed blporis huirt 1 en jove pattel Jlert s beas8 TÅ
djinated sitraženi noll and to ein od yĺ,97 ar JJemusli .îk of
.basolano
DRAFT.
Sir,
305
Shanghai,
.March, 1920.
China (Companies) Amendment Order in Council, 1919.
and
The British American Tobacco Company (China) Ltd.
I have the honour to acknowledge, with thanks, your letter of the 12th instant written on behalf of the above Company informing me of Sir Arthur Churchman's arrival in China, of the visit of Viscount Acheson and your-self to Peking, and of the suggestions then made to Mr. Lampson that, by a further Companies Order in Council, H. M. Minister might be given power to grant licences to 'China Companies' to employ non-British Managers
under special circumstances, and under certain conditions.
While recognizing the difficulties which the British
American Tobacco Co. have, in view of the nature of their busi-
ness in China, in complying with the provisions of the Order in Council of 1919, it is my duty to point out to you that, in my opinion, any alteration permitting non-compliance with its provi- sions even in the case of one China Company, would inevitably tend to render nugatory the safeguards which have been embodied in the new Order in Council, drawn after years of careful con- sideration, whereby provision has been made that Companies regis- tered in Chine enjoying British recognition and protection shall in fact be there under British management.
The Crown Advocate agrees with me in thinking that the
suggested appointment of Sir Arthur Churchman as Chairman of the
Board of your Company in China, even if he cannot take up his
permanent residence there, would be a wise step to take, as an
immediate compliance with Article 4 of the new Order in Council.
I repeat my verbal assurance that in view of the steps
which the management of the British-American Tobacco Co. (China)
Ltd. are taking to conform with the provisions of the China
. B. Kennett, Esq.,
British-American Tobacco Co. (China) Ltd.