due to Bette Collins
or this shirt.
Please new
cranton of 1st Mary /19, etc.
due to Caluers
His
Cave
Cattier exceptional
134
() the Chalmers did as?
G
teaign without permission?
He accepted a
affoited Asst hash
Surveyor = Nov/12
on a 3 years agreement areszied
2228 Nov./14 (167974115) = m
affarell gazettad
2nd Lt. immediately. In view of circular dost & 1 May 19
? Ach
and state that I knew of his
servise in the Army S.JS. Cas decided that he may
be reinstated as from 1st Jan 1918; Slate ahotst
to full period of military service from the date of the Forces will be allowed to count-
joining
for increment & superannuation benefits, but that this will make the
period between his discharge from the Army = 1915
(2)
and his subsequent re-enlistment in 1919;
2
Le man
in 1894/18
tell him that he will be granted ars.
tares as from
472/16
18
in accordance with para 4 of Taglette
anchored in are desp. of 1 May/19-
not the Army on that date;
honoured Re
Granted A full
that date; from the date offis
+
I copy correct C.A. -wing guil
6/5/19
C.A.G. - ref. wis def 1 Mandiq
LEG.
Commission without permission
& the Centred his resignation which
I think we
(16291%).
cust regard
having been accepted
But
the rules
in material differ..
I aire. I may 1818 is clearly intended
to apply to such a case.
(2) [Chalmers was serving on appt
i deil
slightly less than 2
2 years
in 18king.
(3) Hu cie.
Seems
I may
of the day and
41 1815 2
in May 1947
oth
the does not satisfy the conditions in fera
5 of Dr letter end, in arc. I
to have contemplated
continuous military service. In Chelwers clates
That Le
Me and
bytes
invalided out
hall blamed & rejoin.
Recovering his
But as he afflict
1 Jan 1916 for complement this she not be allowed A
wake
any difference.
thes (2) is the only material point.
L'allic that he Chalmus states that he applied
for leave of absence. This is not correct.
- Lice
1679
Page 6
du Bette Collins
or this shirt.
Please new
cranton of 1th Mary /19, eat.
du Caluers
His
Cave
Cattier exceptional
134
() the Chalmers did as?
G
teaign without fummission?
He accepted a
affoited Asst hash
Surveyor = Nov/12
on a 3 years agreement areszied
2228 Nov./14 (1679714115) = m
affarell gazettad
2nd Lt. immediately. In view of circular dost & 1 May 19
? Ach
and state that i new of his
servise in the Ary S.JS. Cas decided that lo may
be reinstated as from 1 to Jan 1918; Slate ahotst
to fule period of militing service from the date of the Forces will be allowed to count-
jönning
for excrement & mperannuation benefits, but that this will make the
period belineen his discharge from the Army = 1915
(2)
a his subser ment sijaining re-enlistment in 1979;2
Le man
in 1894718
い
tell him that he will be grantat ars.
ستفا
tares as from
472/16
18
in accordance with para 4 of Taglette
anchored in are desp. of 1 May/19-
not the Any on that date;
horded Re
Franded A ful
that date ; from the date offis
+
I cofy correct CA. -wing guil
6/5/19
any
P
C.A.G. - ref. wis def 1 Mandiq
LEG.
Commission without permission
& the Centred his usignation which
I think we
(16291%).
cust regard
having been accepted
But
the wakes
in watrial differ..
I aire. I may 1818 is clearly intended
to affly of such a case.
(2) [ Chalmers was serving on appect
i deil
slightly less than 2
2 gras
in 18king.
(3) Hu cie.
Seems
I may
of the day and
41 1815 2
in May 1947
oth
the does not satisfy the conditions in fera
5 of Dr letter end, in arc. I
to have contemplatest
continuous militing service. In Chelwers clates
That Le
Me and
bytes
invalided out
hall blamed & rejoin.
Secovering his
But as he afflict
1 Jan 1916 for complement this she not be allowed A
wake
any difference.
thes (2) is the only material point.
L'allic that he Chalmus states that he afflied
for have of absence. This is not correct.
- Lice
1679
P6
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.