...
71
75
23
ならば
eldarı di
rib..
12
section (4) of the Ordinance.
9.
coord
1 3
-
Record 132
Record
1 3 4 8
Record 358
-
Record
P. 16
12
on the 21st December 1917 the Appellant brought an action against the Respondents in the Supreme Court of Hong Kong.
· rade
10.
on the 15th January 1919 the Governor-in-Council under an order under Section 4 Sub-section (11) of the Ordinance prohibiting the Appellant from being within the Colony for the space of fifteen years and ordering him to depart within seventy-three days.
11.
The Statement of Claim in the action was delivered on the 7th March 1919, and the Defence was delivered on the 16th
118.
The relief claimed by the Appellant was :-
(1) A declaration that a number of actions and proceedings connected with the making of the deportation Order were ultra vires and wrongful or in the alternative that the deportation order made against him was ultra vires and wrongful, and in the alternative a declaration that the Deportation Ordinance 1917 is ultra vires,
(2) A declaration that he is entitled to his immediate liberation and discharge from the present proceedings for his deportation together with the return of the money deposited by him as bail.
(3) Damages.
12.
The case came on for trial before the Full Court (Sir William Rees Davies, Chief Justice, and the Honourable Mr Justice Gompers) on the 24th April 1918.
13.
At the hearing of the action no witnesses were called on
6
...
71
75
23
ならば
eldarı di
rib..
12
section (4) of the Ordinance.
9.
coord
1 3
-
tecord 132
Record
1 3 4 8
Record 358
-
Record
P. 16
12
on the 21st December 1917 the Appellant brought an action
against the Respondents in the Supreme Court of Hong Kong.
· rade
10.
on the 15th January 1919 the Governor-in-Council under
an order under Section 4 Sub-section (11) of the Ordinance
prohibiting the Appellant from being within the Colony for the
space of fifteen years and ordering him to depart within
seventy three days.
11.
The Statement of Claim in the action was delivered on
the 7th March 1919, and the Defence was delivered on the 16th
118.
The relief claimed by the Appellant was :-
(1) A declaration that a number of actions and proceedings
connected with the making of the deportation Order were
ultra virea and wrongful or in the alternative that the deportation order made against him was ultra vires and
wrongful, and in the alternative a declaration that the
Deportation Ordinance 1917 is ultra vires,
(2) A declaration that he is entitled to his immediate
liberation and discharge from the present proceedings for
his deportation together with the return of the money
deposited by him as bail.
(3) Damages.
12.
The oase came on for trial before the Full Court (Sir
William Reas Davies, Chief Justice, and the Honourable Mr
Justios Gompers) on the 24th April 1918.
13.
At the hearing of the action no witnesses were called on
6
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.