M2 Cowell
The explanation is? think, the :-
The
export restrictions can be
looked in prome
de from 2 viewpon 5-
© Restrictions wives out
of Blochade policy
@ Restrictions arising out of
Domestic Policy (C.E. we want (keep
The
2.Euft for naselves vidn't want the
Colo. I-let it go without consulting us)
The latter from the B. FT. saying they
wished to be cosulted to chanted from the
old W.T.D.(muth E.L.0.16GB. 11.). They
concerned only with blockada:& north rationistes
stopped do not wish the commbed.
The restricting wear bed shad. be
noposed is an El. of 7th Jan.
were of the beading (1)
alme order. The commodities in grestin
ware thone "The list is a
It has ke
deal masti...).
Rast
In Fiddian
Please see
>
(
I have
no
whide certain Depts. wanted crewed it tast dele obrash, out of let The E.L. Dept. partim flie B.FT. is, feruose, not interested in this; thoughs, of course, they sections might be. (<.g., Espaper.)
Ast copene cresunt in the consenton
questom here is one for the M. JF. At present I believe, they are my too glad to me the staff going chewhere.
(I had deal with their ina ft. burrry:
I hope it is den what you
LA 73.28.5.19
99
preceding minutes.
the fovernors
notion how
will inderpres
I
be at
there instructions,
am afraid we shall shortly
cross-purposes with applicants
However, as
no dept
for licences.
seems sufficiently interested to under-
take
Me
revision
here
articles required
domestic policy,
to fovernor
refer
the list of
A
matte
I propose to
all applicants for
Ship anything but
Y
Wan
licences to
material:
the fovernor refers back, to authorize the particular shipment.
JM Fiddian
29.5.19.
I understand
Jou
agree.
J
propose as an alternative to refer all applications, precisely on the lines udspud in the past, to B of I. ( Export ficaness) If they approve as they still do sometimes, well & food: if they repeat that they do not
wish to be committed, we can
SC
that
>
F.
pproval. Would this meet your objection
doe
-295-69