the / boot, could not have avoided incurring.
heavy expense
site if they
over this matter, for
had not intervened in the
civil action, they would have had forthwith to take criminal proceedings
which would have involved beavy costs. tot if, after they had intervened in the
civil action it had resulted in
of the plaintiff, day
Parous
would still have
had to take criminal procedungo
against the defendants with the like
sault, might
moreover have had
considerable costs to pay also in respect of the civil actifier.
مه
with
things
весину
are
they
are paddled
costo in respect of the
civil action, for costs will be incurred in respect of criminal proceedings which commot now be taben.
& was
of
infossible to
ible to forase
which of these three positions might
have been the least expensive for the
DRAFT.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
MINUTE.
Mr. Grindle.
Mr. Lambert,
No H. Read.
4. Fiddea.
... Bewins.
1. Long.
الله
36
Inst. of M.Song, but I incluie however to think that, apart from the
317
question of expense, it would
more
have been wys of in accordance
with
legal
r constitutional
Фргосекдир
propriety if the goot. had refeined from intervening in the Civil Seat
adopted position (thenti by Forening formon of this had endeavoured to
Autab
sundicate the adm? of justice
S. Hong by an atteft to
oh the
punish
wrong duens, rather
than by giving
عسل
party in
3.
a
addistance to
private out.
I must express
at the length
surprise meget at the
of
time occupied by this activi
(Signed) WALTER H, ILNU
Gook