hught
one
would have thought, have leda
to special provisions being made
I don't see
to them.
4
what in the food of 3 (or a doom)
A
infection during construction by a particularly
competent and conscientions Overseer of the
caatstek
PRO.
if ther
The fine
dra
& Shafer after all.
consequential on the collefre
and therefore the chief responsitibly would seem
to hot with the
Paro. (to for the
coothing not being authorised, there is nothing
show that it
fr Love
as
Etho
forbidden) satisfactory explanation of way
the collapse took place. The for. sand fanie,
A
latent defect in the material used "
? ach:
289
say them 5078 is flad to note
that the condition
are fermuthet me
& that in
walshed
~
under which large aratoned
beny revised the (as in dara 4):
the frcutian native
described in fara Spa/ hi Long
is surprised that special
conson hai not been
Seven haviously to the contist of the erection
of large matched.
If such
a
anth
disaster as
द
view to the avoidance
has occurred.
·
bus
the Jury say
theve i
wo direct evidence
that
the normal strain was
increased
Shani
A Lafer de recently gone on
For. Suppered
A
in which the
heavy bones on retirencant
The Jury further say that three is as evidena kat
Rich
the sheds were subjected to condul strain
amed of people" semmo although there was "a large to climinate the possibility that the stands
Lave been
Key
way
crowded for begond the capacity which
was designed, and exfected by the int Doucer
The Zury point out some fandts of facture design common, but they also think the
to have.
[way
-unsunt fauch have been due to sizes" ausu sigled
to have Chathaeu
connection of
Gera
می کنم
be
O.PW.
to that
well to bear thes
ی و استانی کی ھے
I
agree
-
Nik
23/768
The dangers arising from the
congregation of large crowds in buildings of flimsy construction ought to have been
nate to minimize foreseen, & steps taken at the results of any
any accident.
Hol 23.7.18
25:215