i
with the matter semi officially
thu Shails case
results
satisfactory.
(for 125/7/16 (App): but
J
This wen
not entirely
C
? write to the Editor of the Times
History of the War saying that Gor. hom
drawn attention & certam statements
in thes
Ваша ват
seflections
which cast grave Loyalty Of the
the Colonial Adevinestration:
that such reflections
Jeinion unfounded
in Er Long's
and mitchicoons and
request hat in jestive to the Coll. Gott
to be full chall
widely
he ring will foothile the Welling as
is fossille.
08
€9/2/2
In the Straits can
there wan
ch
definite
issue of fact in the picturesque story
ferman spy peleted by the fovernos
to dinner at
278
that the S. IJS. regrets the armögen u
which
Career
* A
these unfounded allegations must to the for.
advisers; that having regard to their flucral nature he
in present conditions
doubto whether any correction would
the minds o
[produce much effect on
inclined to believe them;
if the for.
but that
to dencies, the S. JS. Car
no objection to his taking ofpropriate steps
Coser of
ल
contradict there wither by the statement to the local pres
or by way of question in the Covenant.
Peronally
Hanh
The Gad
much better leave it alous.
The fact that
he is still for shores he claims
confidence of
to escape
H. M. B., *
تب کر کے
const infect
his share of the prevalent
med slenging.
McLoug Japa
frindle
^7
mm
24. Ni
23.7.18
G. b.
as for with my
otu reply
Fr
24.7
motor
Frob. Storene.
Stere
it to
C Care
cisinuation
a circendo.
مان
the present stati
Exci fluent ✔dabt-
Whether the fort. of H. King would get
much satisfaction out of such a letter as is profired.
I think the reply to the foreror is
!