+
in the Short in
the freation cinces
7
them care
I and
ast saine objects
13 the increment (+ future increments)
but mirely draw attention & it and
say it mustn't be regarded
efecis
precedent.
the Pension profersal, thin
is most insegular
I am
Pumprised
that #kong the walle the suffection.
O feculiar
w that this is not a case or exercirding count, a which special
Serinces have
been rendered altogether
ексер
beyond the usual seife of those wh. the
offrees paid to ferfin
I say that the Soft cannot
the proposal and
сре
tor Exc locis pension when
in leher must be calculated in the ordinary
May 27/263
As to the increments -
approval of
the
Mr McIver
was
pant of
Boarding Officer's full salary
the
the 184
to
stralf
a
breach of not therefore
the Col. Regns. We need
Say anything about the incremento
-
which
On Me over might presumably
receive
Ander
Col. Rec. 79 of
Mi
Daily
177
while
Should in fact not return take the substantive appt.
to
* *.8
Pout the pension proposal seems
Minutes
to be contrary to No. 13 of the Pennow
herefore innamusiba. I
om Me Iver's "permanent
presume that
appt
1.
от
is that
of Inspector of Juntes,
sinlers & until he is confirmed in the appt
1st Boarding Officer. Be
29.7.18
H.GiB.
31/7/18
G.8.1.8.10
али