167
ITE ON REÏN
„nożymai „FUOČ DIE TODË
„VIÐI „Taámoet, Kres
V
I reɑndgel .dish Yo vaskul
ATINO E M
.Y 900
718
ade to noieredre at of ankerior freeqwg orë te doe¿dere e dê tê
Viðarredo erine teŝto nd wor womedi oda avad I
ePromot yde inoð vað boðrzoqresni odé hneddol and hot Lemned-
no apollo? Jeid omnð tradt a ot as Lanoqong aft
.S
nedes que al Fre bend of ek hodelidadne vitrenar mataya arit a noiteibeitet ode galasotank of Ovktorsed La es on dard bedɛ at ang movis phoetla ungezet to) „oved I „drome) drit bredre of gridtet to) (wodu mad sací comes ¿nokoli Tas
-non erit diwa ordfororis · Imrede doo¿dum skidó bao ¡rožackbuizaj drung dead NO SVĚTTA YOM yamilewi wedi deite da omakorlɔ- a midriideden af noktaejde de TOTOTari Des I -est franco medio „barng ng an I her ¡demove yem að deil saad ProdƐ roddi mɖ and bar teƐ odr
• Iladah at en neit-
Jaboqruq dailė 70% trwać do olaf 4 vám, ĐẾ přežo cê vai adá to -re besogong end na bw avatudni rovovari Zon 11kw ● Lui a rend est to yiverd esT „noltelbadsug twoƐ yearmad odie Yo nehmed-
q pre jouquet
mi dromm erit ne fregab yiltnereser ten sech zermanen tervek To clóstle roero O VŽITOLAK ONż pidadmą two+In „stuqu25
.000,0% madid enel to eme ovlovni hiver Full overrü
erkt to 1 rqrgeteq në bankatron moltre g☛n act
fari I doir ortuos ert vitners el volool wed art to model
yons [Isox
• Removed, you, yonok ni
in effect already adopted as appears from paragraphs and 8 of
my letter to Your Excellency of 13th. June last, to which I invite
attention. The proposals of the Law Society are however I asame intended to apply in future and after the long case now in esse, and I will deal with them as such. My experience teaches me that delay consequent on applications for adjournment is of almost every day occurrence.
The app
lications are common to Counsel and
Solicitors alike.
The Law Society anys "If it were know that
the latter practice (that of proceeding de die in diem with the trial of cases) would be strictly enforced solicitors would have their cases ready, and if a pending case for any reason broke down or was adjourned, the Court would at once proceed with the next case, instead of adjourning the case for several days as
often occurs".
These namrks are followed by some reference to the sittings of the Court, which purport to imply some delay on the part of the Court in disposing of the work. This is an entire travesty of fact and the solicitors know it. Applications for adjournments involving continual delay are, as I have said, of daily occurrence and evoke the strongest protests from me. The Court would gladly dispose of each case by sitting de die in diem upon it, but such an attempt is almost invariably frustrated by applications for adjournments. The reason assigned generally is that Counsel is not ready, and at the conclusion of one case he requires time to prepare another. The suggestion of the Law Spciety "that if a pending case broke down the Court would at once proceed with the next case instead of adjourning for several days" is most disingenuous and I am surprised that with their knowledge of the facts they venture to vouch for their cases "being ready" so that the rule may be enforced. The real explana- -tion of course is the scarcity of Counsel, five only being available. This obstruction, which the solicitors object to remedy, I have endeavoured to avert in the proposals which Your
Excellency
**I OFTE VON