134
art at harus rktiw drommre voð are yd qui reded cold isoq edi .8
eiß yd ni drvozd 'na rea da lesine ebong to seio valiolduq
o nomi domare namiwo'int erit ni hemmetque el eqidƐ s'ydan†Øk
**mer") Imminhd-sel▼ of Tormevol edd ynom{[no¬¤ eil movi së dəqrəb
-inold-d8 rnið?oir%-nl-qnifme: wol
ere to roddel tuny mile fronden at vinnod wit weed I'
boog wine to eurizmo act of pride fer viel .Fr£S"
Tecprq [Ir ni redet ød Tiiw egelbesoơng Juod szinq*
bro ves me beries ajuro være begalla pia denlege verno
sit ei bich ogre ersuns to gribi font panedyrok odal driquord"
azamizud no antyman to dabirer ntral due game to ydreqore"
to ferahlenor ød [!i* mitvern and bra „melƐ to anino mi"
edt to moitelheimet në sh Center ernamaq yne qnidodon WTY"
Tynnied wind to advørð"
to rnorteq to yorqonq art ei deine ogren to demo arid ~I“
darIU wriƐ to naino ent m ennaraq to ro „deld vodudedƐ ere"
'
and divid megge blug 31 (atnej dưm youre don as ɔde du}J* draveng að ed [Ile shoog end durings eldteang midor tino" Bitarnog dove es „nolzeniteab vimit of habientot anled "lers"
."menocinq drud eriti tot selere for BI«*
bed amoitousduri darle TO:TAVOð með berrvotni bar trærð Lob££
od zradom svedt ni gaiterego #gidƐ e1yðænþ»M #iH në newly mand prano Tertia yriyatro baun? aqide deiðinɛ yre droq odal gain
enido to tell vandutetë erë no email of unigro fed aboog to shoog
‚ránil doc[8 MOIR TO
fremme voð sꞌyðnajem #28 dest marowań, besoqqr'a new di
睿
ܝܪ܂
hoog to caro ent neended ment ed at moitaniteit a bebrŽNĚ
4
erle han mold" and "a rola Huhej edït sbistvo res de beries * from aro>broß de érangkément ~-1 beriema rhodą. To saco new di .ynofoð erst to noldsitahuj add mbele kw despond pithetnulov maefo reddnl end Yo abover, det en noitentet art dorit Kom i fe d -rem o ynem te bmiorg eft me don Loruletmot of ridell ed biparie ydiego!!k adt to barova ant no dud,noidesideri ya mkalno,qine- -Tertio vere no "i raidoitabrj and midt im ebnom decus galibner. To
no veids bened new tel'ed eidt „roidvnitseh zo skybro,qide-
5.
the enactment of section 6 of the Customs (War Powers) Act, 1915, 5 & 6 Geo. 5, c.31, and section 2 of the Customs (War Powers) (No. 2) Act, 1915, 5 & 6 Gạo. 5, c. 71. It was also noticed that section 1 of the Customs (War Powers) Act, 1916, 5 & 6 Geo. 5, c. 102, seemed to contemplate the forfeiture of goods belonging to omers resident outside the United Kingdom, and that the gazette notioss issued under the seation contained cases where the com- -signors and consignees were both resident in neutral countries. In spite of the apparent adoption of a policy of forfeiture of such cargo in the United Kingdom it was felt that the power was a very unusual one and ought to be exercised with great caution. No steps were taken to enforce my forfeiture under either section until May, 1916, when proceedings were begun in Case No. 1 referred to below. It was then advised that a full opportunity of appearing should be afforded to possible claimants, and it was intended that the case should be a test case. No one, however, appeared to oppose the forfeiture, and the order of forfeiture was made on the 19th. August, 1916. There have been in all four cases of forfeiture under section 11 and no case has any one appeared to oppose the forfeiture. The details of the five cases are given below. All along, caution in the use of the section and the necessity of giving full notice to possible claimmte have been insisted upon. There has been ore proceeding under section 10 of the Ordinance. The details of this onse are also given below.
6.
MO
With regard to paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Secretary of 4J45 State's Despatch of the fth. February, 1916, it should be pointed out that the provisions of section 11 were extended to persons en the Statutory List by section 4 of the Trading with the Enemy (Extension of Powers) Ordinmce, 1916, Ordinance No. 4 of 1916. The action in Cases Nos. 4 md 5 below was based on this extension of powers and was not taken in the belief that persons on the Statutory List were enemies within the mewing of section 11 of Ordinance Na. 22 of 1915.
7.
The limitations laid down in the Secretary of State's Despatch will be observed in future cases, but an amendment of the