tot
Where
admired
doubt
whellen
Courts
amy. the M. Kong
would give
such a
t
this
constructions
rende
should
farb
sections
you
legislation with
amy
arending
a viur
to removing
fossibility
31.
question
Lorfeiting
for ou
amany
Jove in
A
a
ޑނޑު
of doubt
of
amy
the
of goods
comung
لهم
seizure and
dastemad
from
struct sense
firm included
Statutory from
view of
Four
advised
wh.
ab
List requires
the point of
international laut.
this
aspect
that
follows
(a) on the
are
of fuiss
List
J
I am
the frontion
cabl
actually
of goods the property the Statutong forfeiture of the
Ov
either unden
Goods
of Corde
aminy
further
to meet
bre. !!
22 of 1915 of
Bralce.
udtee
fassed
the doubt referred
in fara. I of this dash;
would be
inconsistent with
& which are taimed
or destined for.
from
pian an enemy or a firm
the Statutory
dest
an
The principles land down in to preceding Jara (1) also apel in the case of goods
international law.
(+)
wh are
every
47
The forfeiture of goods
the property of
the
strict seaml
British law
under
but such goods
legitimate
Cammot
Be
forfeited otherwise
tham by
A
decision of a
Prize Count
(c) Goodo
w
are
forefarty of a farson or
Aseriding
Emfure
with
or
im
the
Bi
carrying on
Beretish
Athe
therefore cubject to Brutal jurisdiction
cam, consistently international
law,
by a count the than a Rise Corest
forfeited if obtai at fire
fon
if
the local lawel
formity such
Statutory
(d) The procedure of
Lorfaiting
unrighede
abro
be
of goods destined
whi
ane
J
obtained from or for an exomy the frohenty of femmes carrying
Allied
that
on
винитесь
territory
the
im
بكارة
frovided
shipment of t92