496
efficiency? They are I think held to be so in other
Colonies. See Mr. Robinson's minute on slip attached to
deap.
A&C
16.2.17
This racises the question, veccable, unch
of Lopes roth
des cussed,
of
the interrelation
f
Col.
Mee 73 med such colonial reachments
as the proviso to The 15 of the Tulad
Prusins ada sumilar ("model"
Pusing ondes I
The It. Pension's minuti has statisting
form to this Extent that pensions or
AAL
Just
-
made prasath his expantid
in
i conformity with the provisions contained in varices of Gove
relative; thirsts"
as wi
it was кую
frend
MILLORARY
to provide for comfrets retirement
авво однінна at bo by orderiamas, so the proposed howes to retire for inefficacising
must be provided for (ifat all))
by ordinanc
- The wording
of ord" 2 of abs we not coons a
provision in this behalf Pensions misunt.
T
in thes
The Excistence of the Tikad & simulas Aerobation refund to above and the Ims wractunt with the
Goo sam to make it my
Capes
under ad 201
!!
difficult to meration his proposat
reward in afference,
L
But then is the further proposal to rona
for compratson, retirement fran
the ant
to to 55.
The "Pingo Meling" ord" of 1910 | which
as
se 3 of ate 201. 1862 ui
the ther how Book | makes the asy
to
in the case of "are, Judays other public offer"
I am doubtful whether the
07
C
should
to reduced (27 Juda, es and perhaps
won with consider this porn't conexion with the retinues
for
jadejo
Colmce's
Wh
in the other Castion
Mr. Grindle
5/2/7
Retirement for inefficiency. I suppose the
Col. Regg. have been held to authorize this as being a
disciplinary measure short of dismissal, safeguarded
by the pleasure of the Crown.
If statutory authority is required, S.3. (and F.M.S.}
have satisfatory provision. Whether Ceylon has, I feel
more doubtful. Ord. 11 of 1910 appears to give power,
but the exercise of it in the Pensions Minute, in