F
1
F
may
involve the deportation & Chinese
who are British ruljeh nitraty by birth
thing Int thingh their, als being Wirtich worn.
ir parent
As the law now stands the Err has sance & deport Chenise person. form in thong & parents who were af
Antit valjeet. Such son in the
persons
ye & Artish law are.
Birtish valjn
& the question is whether we ought
sanction a further extension of thes
to
departure from extathisted practed.
I do not much like the idea of sporting persons who me so subjects as Chinese hom in
v.
definitely Writing Jae me
Along
1 Chinese torn in thong but it is las oben & gejse hon that their he deportation & other classes & Dr.
Theory
subjects because Chine, in if it in practice, clamins at Cheneve Chimère valjeets & when in China
they are,
tered at the
anders registered
Por.comm late, hille the heated
•hemise saber to
alwaing set ou faces <cportation
aqueral fricicip
MA
Arany
it seems early other
the prestige & chan Landedness of justree Along the maintained. In for can be no other way net of the difficulty (nor can 1). the Chenèse menkes
1 Council are in favour of thes whition I think it is by far the less of two wils
Mr. Rieley
Mr. Brindle
I agree
-
? Appral proposal
and say
Kapp
that the exercise of the new
power should be confined to the present class of cases, as
il
in par. of desp.)
A&@
18.2.17
I agree and per 13 of the desp. in, think,
and
sound. The power could or taken by a regu made by the Grove under the 1896 One as
amended wi Igit, but the
rezn des appens when the bus exoes out of operations by prock after the was
W over-
The wit la uires permanent berpolation
Ith with it it to a good thing