tud, bereqqad ea teria ɣItoaxe
COPY.
derdos to •STAWA JOE #18 #W
.abata "left bequado evať asidirodius edi Sadd amwaeng
no rattal et evlenen ew 11 tait au of amoen I
ew folde quibuzaen asi÷iroitus grofgroll wit mort etnoliitreo ΤΙ .9980 #ft team binow atrit,tauguá „1389 wit zo voy stor .saltinodtua arodącoЯ efft mort brow bevisoen deg na dok évad voy ed hiuso toldw Msaroy zettek a nu odkazu yibaki woy bluow bluow aldt hus vyistalbawmi sol110 mobstoj two od bebzawTO) Vzov VIIanuŤÁK SZA OV na tosite bertuah eɗt evad yidadoną Howa .yafeb zaitzul tuodtiw betuosze rebro adfi avad of avoixaS BWONDHOR NOT? voltaalwissmoo a yd betweweiqqua ed bivoo rottel a
• ÇZANGO5G 12 Total
Iftw voy habraqawa yientiza ed solasimroq blooda an .vIIetovami? «nol uldanebṭavoo retive Llafu ew jadi exliaor telt madt seoquuq reddo que not beau ed tommso saidɔam mďt Inoof d+lw beoziq ed yidadoną iitw rebro eoalger a bra
wežat ybaenia evañï joy eidsont sit tot voy yatimadt
«*££uti+kat aquof
+.00 ₺ DHLIAM .td
‚ONIJATH .t .d (.de)
·ITI
bekretæ
(OLA 61, 201łam uldt TITO
Gentlemen,
101
office of Commercial Attache.
for Japan.
No. 178 Tamashitacho, Yokohame..
4th. Bovember, 1916.
With reference to your letter of 2nd. November
in connection with the order for Siemens China Electrical
Engineering Co. Ltd., Hongkong, you will recollect that I
told your Kr. Eddison that I had received a despatch from
the Colonial Secretary, Hongkong, saying that in reply to a
telegram from the Secretary of State for the Colonies asking whether the despatch of this mohine might be allowed, a reply
has been sent saying there was no objection.
This however was in August last, and it is
impossible for me to say whether any change has now been made.
You will realize of course that in dealing with a firm like that
of Siemens, which may have indirect enemy commotions, pointe
may occur at any tim which hamper business. I have therefore
sext copy of your letter to Hongkong asking whether any further
information can be given.
I am &c.,
(ED.) E. F. OTOWE.