2165
- with increments
On the whole 9 Think it
before.
may
legitimality be argued that to give
a
larger louse allce to married wen
does not go against the principle of
not differentiating between married and
conmarried
the
exolamento being
in
cathe
Cist
A
fixed salary
the equivalent of quarters, which
normally cost the married man
Hone
This should
coon
ast a
excessive if
of living has
Lista
650
35%.
? Wel
to
to
for. that we
and
prefarsch
afprove of
af
A if he
HB
his processing
Leen
L
27/7/16
objon
A
In view
1 Rough her
way
be cases where the
f
the desp. on
43175/15-
I
unwarried have defendents and need-
1
J
A
inconvencent
just ar
musty
|
Bur
Buck
differentiation might
Le
¡
extra expense
out
B
and
very
at in spite of
off any
the best
way
grant
a
seems to be
leat all es
B745
per month to all married officers
antitled to pree quarters and liomp
ри
in reatest quarters_ from
quarters from 1 Jan 1817
(not 1916
3)
1986 as in faca 3.
hesitate to approve this proposal: but-
the circumstances of
to call for some relief,
Kovs
these men seem
I should
propose that the proposal be given
that
temporary approval, on the understanding
as possible free quarters will be provided for the officers
as
LA -
amed.
Yes, as at
Hol at by
28
7.46
( It seems clear that if
these men are entitled to free quarters and are not
provided with free quarters they should temporarily
have an allowance
roughly reasonably equivalent to what