៩៩៥
.T
*$191. Buantsud and to sprawią, odÅRT
padi, yab wit yooled art of benzuten mitei við stata gainos?
„ÉISI JHAMNĂ ziv „bangis sew agbaiq şə
ben iz zattal s te vges wvid ni ezerit has ri#11 fougua no bav¿Ti
Invitia oki solatyba yrażameƐ InineIoð ert of Untama? LE: yế
,noitesup ni benyže înecarob siit le stab aria – KISI arit batek
(L*i* ba= taemki zot NAROZSAH .ZI FRANKA MST #53 10
•
MolinoTT 5 bae ;uimet .1% to sucvet ni yonzotti lo sowol a betumɔxs.
el to bawory sốt no enankand grit no TTTNO of merit aidano ot
.ɣmelað erit most zzyizstab nazout
ine art et beaubostał bas nadat new ad notatu zažMƏT .IM
bluew Xael art sikdi bamzotni aequezasit nangi .ali bas Invizza Bid no
„saanlend stað á qçusð t arta axesak to zagansii mări Jalogg-
Atel nọ zaknast „Tk of toas saw taganači un tamutaloggs to rattol
Tattal a ban,is munartse¤ ‚X .* turi aton of zakteszotai si ti
BEACH ALİNİTRɔ wazh od neženimzoq gabies tuugak ritk£ est no Kaak slit at
iqmətta on any apart au benzotal amemtssk .I.TH „Ének erit moti
abzoĽbnał alt of navky soiton zo zotanassoq ad od dnaði arit yď absm
Inantntogea and bua abutamsih amood asta 10 tkmoqab arit ne: 3 Ts.ido
• TOŞANAN Bn gatans?.T: 1c
Vynolod suit 37^31 Jon blb answTIS » E *** Joal to zaidan S SÅ
Vilaužnaya bas os ob o* noleringsg bad ad „bandexabau aw „izuostis
bus sit abzmwoć saw to zanosing a se profanoël në bangatal sow siť
„biti zadatað ko
nini bavisosz bad art dizuotis tedd eu merzoluk zakonet,TMM
lit do gniniwan ng unaoH ‚A,2 to Joni arid zogenaa" na taandatoqq÷
436
Hongkong and working as usual in the shop caused him to regard
Mr. F. Heermann as still in charge of the business and his own
appointment as being in abeyance pending the daily expected
departure of his employer. In fact he always looked to Mr.
7. Heermann for instructions, vide our letter of 11/11/14 in which
we reprimanded him for advancing each to Mr and Mrs Heermann,
his explanation being he still regarded Mr. F. Heermann as the
owner of the business,
It appears from the firm's letter book that all
correspondence with the Bank (apart from the letter of the 14th
August above mentioned) was signed by Hr. Penning in his own name under
the stamped signature of Chs. J. Gaupp & Ce between 17th and 26th
August and afterwards as per procuration Cha. J. Haupp & Co.
A.L. Penning until 28th Oct. 14. It will be noted there is
no mention of the word "Manager".
To confirm this contention, an important letter was
signed by Mr. P. Hearmann on 31st August to Messrs Mappin & Webb Ltd.,
London, outlining some finance arrangements, intimating business
was progressing as usual and informing them that the Firm had
given Mr. Panning a power of procuration as he had been with the firm
for some time and asking them to regard his signature as their own.
In this letter it states the Firm is unable to remit money by Draft
but assures them that, iổ they will draw, all bills will be duly met.
A similar letter to Kesers Imray, Laurie, Noris & Wilson was written
on same date but not sent.
On 25th September letters were written to Kesure V.F.
Stanley & Co Ltd., A. Haswell & Sons, Happin & Webb Ltd, Whitehorn