127
Radecker and Company. This is no doubt the case referred to in paragraph 5 of the Colonial Secretary's letter of the 23rd September enclosed in
49524.
Reply that we understand that the brokers of this firm are being paid half their salaries by the liquidators, and that this case is receiving considera- tion with thegeneral question referred to above.
Sander Wieler and Company The relevant papers with regard to this firm cannot at present be found, (see, however, enclosure 1 in 40875) but I think we can safely say that Mr Backhouse is not carrying on Sander Wieler and Company's business but is carrying on an independent business on his own account and that
he has received no licence to use the firms old
trade-marks.
Wendt and Company.
Some of the relevant papers
regarding this firm are also missing. See, however,
enclosure 1 in 40875. I think, howers, that our last
has got rid of his information was that Mr Hannibal former agent
ر
G.C.Huygen in Canton
and has satisfied the
Government that he was carrying on business on independ-
ent lines. We might perhaps, 'so reply. We should also
state that he is carrying on business under supervision, see paragraph 3 of 40875.
Lamke and Rogge. See enclosure 3 in 40874.
It appears that Snowman though of German education and | possibly of German sympathies is a British subject, and
that he bought Lamke and Rogge's business in 1909.
1
We might reply in this sense (omitting reference to German education and sympathies.
Siemssen and Company. See 13483 and 40875.
Reply that Mr Manners is carrying on business on his own account under a license which contains the specific condition that he must not carry on business on behalf
of Siemssen and Company.
Ulderup and Schulter.
So far as I know we have
So reply
no detailed information about this firm.
adding that the question whether the assets of Jebsen
and Company could be made liable for the debts of Ulderup
and Schulter would appear to be a purely legal one, which
the local government is fully competent to decide.
Jaque El
c6.19.11.05
Are
૨૦. }{. 13-
20-71-15
As proposed hat I think we shed my
ор
speribirely
that them is no foundation
what for the sijusin wie it is
anggestant promil is the
busines
Yes, say
WE CAN
3. of S understan
Are
see now Gov / 522
a
Lenew th
OB 22/
botny
"that the
and to be soft alive with thes
the bow will this to
position invardinting they
ramme opentr
an whoment t
Am 21.11
of