1
is true that the neutral flag covere
This matter. Th
hery goods; but this 431
t is also true that article
ion of London may have seemed
contraband. 523 the Declara-
186 Jaunu! Jølede tuteinne” ogh game de fal
etnwol breaworld #vit-y‡nowï to mus gela
Persin-4 elona schi unqqirla mend bad
་་ ppp dejta blow add add saddle¶
2
presů odd að bemyianco sew
i de vari sex intgrena,ni yomotus asor de bakke gebraandmi e'gdamįr} all!
- י
00 İlвäzy; mort yaibhneriq BBW
nim peribro al dedo ima Instyawda eð
*ele odni beqgirenend read avel bluew B od te nucosa no Jard dod i forendi rsed bed noidowijani nemoje (thol VEMÅ
.yamunt, Juedebauch
očni esixiupna isool quidem requ Punktvol end në duke delgid no Lodqarg bennüm e'ydasjali sil bovinos: cala ber
HB or period‡A ada tedd „JeIS Jeugua To Houlked or lo negenen yiuqel sde ad c
fan ni om kongenge (sc yek yans!! zia
edu je bio Just as
.qida fridumo e ni gaotsach dywords
1950 yinəH. Tiŭ Ensrísıqmoo Jen ob 1
on a neutral vessel coming from a neutral consignor; but reference to His majesty's Order in Council of 11th Arch 1915, Article III would appear at the very least to demand the detention of the gold until the attorney of the Guaranty Trust of whose equivocal position as deputy manager of an enemy semi-government bank, notice had been given satisfied the Courts of the Colony that the shipment was in reality innocent and did not come within the words in the Order in Council of August 20th 1914, "if the goods are consigned to or for a merchant
the authorities or other person under the control of of the Enemy State".
Copy of this despatch has been sent to the Foreign Office and His Majesty's Ambassador at Tokio.
I have, etc.,
(Signed) E. H. FRASER
Consul General
eldetuonok JrtyiЯ :
י
+
....0. 10.X & A Ja.1.0.0 (mabrol mdol zie
„zataimik o'yəsəğıllı ail
.00 T
は
i