2.

20

vd enrod ed biwow 107orod roars gas, grot sa* vild 10 YILI GIANO O

Vanať? 930m od ten hlưow gołɛatrwoo toa oft bas ynaqnos Izsol

s helles už tade bevloset ovaď of tasqEN .00 I bas I amido affT

cais El aasi yaiviosat ylisutoa mmixam >25 to star zakisamaquoa

berkopen now dit asuso omon mI .beda er den sam saing botafugita

aðarmega Ila zev 00 03 bəhnədri noed evad of ameon siɗT TINO

on toveved erow demand invol edt noknakaros mivier zalkai Daž

noitto best vindt dispertë žuď vrojaat adð dółw tooiih yalinob

Drið mær Ở meer gem of aIdlaseg den ersteredt 62 #1 .unaerted at

- CROSSAT Výh adi yf borožis noteskmes Intof

Grit facit noon of [Ilw $1 vemoga a'seadet, of ynimESS GA

jul to notuakume irader bem molauimuoe (mixan a king Trotoat Vom sint,shant erit nutriang to sognoqre aistros mattikäs nt bas

.V10205Ť eďá os blag thľadom democrtevog a fourqua den Cam 10 moniot of ataq thinďựu toonih vra of Jon TITROËN MËNOW STOLT to ajat aniIAI VIISSUM edt at vine 199Qqs binow via ti „doir

-nao I Lyratasi ed? mort smelt vď bevicsen melastamos pati -Laatonda bereklamo ed of al 2o to sertova ks Vorffarir que ten

Hon. Attorney General,

Jebsen only started exporting in April 1913. He

bought the goodwill of A. Goeke & Co. Mr. Van der Stan, former-

ly in Goeke & Co. and now employed by the liquidators in Jebsen

& Co. informed me that Goeke had done well to sell a failing business. In former years they had looked for a 4% or 5% net profit, but of recent years 2%, 14% or even 1% was quite an

ordinary net profit. Any exporting firm (except perhaps those which carried out large contracts to order) would say that owing

to continual eutting of prices the barest profit was made. It

was a highly speculative business, particularly in the case of

aniseed oils and in a less degree in bristles where prices

were very sensitive and the market extremely fluctuating.

The approximate figures for nine months April to

December 1913 for Jebsen & Co. were:-

Outlay on goods (including freight, insur-

ance, loss on exchange, return com- mission)

.difiemt dedi

.be

$570,000

Charges (salaries, rent, telegrams, etc.)

30,000 $600,000

Prices realised

$376,000

Value of unsold goods (at market rate on

December 31st)

208,000

Net loss

16,000

$600,000

It is clearly impossible to draw any conclusion

from a single balance shest particularly from such a balance

sheet as this, where 40% of stocks are unsold and are written

down to their market value on a particular day (December 31st).

In a fluctuating market these stocks may very well recover dur-

ing the following year with the result that an apparent loss in

1913 becomes an apparent profit in 1914. In the present case

the loss was actually due to a fall in the price of aniseed oil.

I understand a much greater fall has occurred recently and that

in consequence a very considerable debit balance will appear in

the

Share This Page