deportation
1
British subjects who are bom nich tong Chinese parents not Buitish subjects and who do not porvers certificates & Buitish birth
The interpretation indicated by Sur 7. May in his deep of 24/1/14/Ser/5757/140)
that the S.S. Did not affort of the dessitation of persons registered in a British Consulate in China
M
Le Lever
dieetly answered this point but the 2. pomited but in 20/16786/14 (acopy which went to for) that Ugistration at a consulate does not necessarily entitle to protection The law as it stand (52 Love 20/14) allows deportation of presons Colony non-Buitish-bjects
in
A
Corn in the
A
unless such person has obtained 'artificate of his Autist birth or
is egestered in a British Consalate
in Chiria
L
a person entitled to
British protection in China
On the panel principle that the test
is possession th
Bitish born
(
cutificate not repitiation at 1895 Consulate, I aper with the for and
La ho
My on to amending the law. But it seems to the that it is not necessary
that the local law offices (if asked to
a to 70. advice) were not acquainted a Walter 97/5/14 (72/16766/46) which says chawl "Such, mono an one hand, not entitled & Bitish protution
on the
if registered, in the first time unluquently to the Late of the circular (1904". Consequently the axistration of a man in
1 1914 not did not entitle him to notiction the cd not he egistred entitled & notition. If coral the Combati onay here repistured him in
A
Perhaps we has better fut 2.0. ctions infore uplying
Bell/1zt se conson.
ploms
Ar
JR29/7/05.
ArĈ 29.7