[
101
mpeioʻraq sual and ni versenyre jeijer and exus I
duals ovan bilole coiniyo to earenettib sind dand nattel way to si buvlovni siyiming to roidueup and Jand Beton I .Bu neewjed Jaav and dołow ri ynoleɔ s ni viliosque,comstrogni intiv to yani esam ‚eost neils na to al moitelugog ent to winojen benicnt er myeoi110 yantiiki wel „Tev aeiostorysoibi bae criodnut od [liw di Tuogo eo madtučsib to doin livio a 11 .brusderobe oð
viv pa ni Airpolydo si ji baa,noidali jog nelle minid gnom beyging o pilnios qa ni dolum witondwa livið ert Jads eideriesb
tuttejni ed Jon Finale soiteluyog sind naiv freb od leuierd bus
16bro ynitoreat not sowasem adi ni ndiv and beuni ev ut I evous bodade anoaner add 10%
.d
I prw ‚ees Jenit bluoda poy auoitus new I droywq a■odw,Tebro signiorer Bu mverjed solairuyab1100 arid to ygoo s gribnes me .aeinold and tot aand? to vinterpel ent of
Vad I
+
*
YAM .H.I
Minute by the Attorney General.
I respectfully agree with His Excellency the Governor's statement of the practical position with regard to riots at the present time, which, in my opinion, has not, for present purposes, been altered by the proclamation of the Order in Council of the 26th October, 1896.
In strict law, "a soldier for the purpose of establis] -ing civil order is only a citizen armed in a particular man- ner", and "no officer is justified by English law in standing by and allowing felonious outrage to be committed merely because of a magistrate's absence" or because of the absence of a civil requisition. A salutary rule, however, requires a civil requisition and the presence of a magistrate, and I do not think that this rule has been affected by the above Order
in Council.
•lus, Torrie VOD
!!
Sd.
J. H. KELP Attorney General.
30th October, 1914.