-Ş-
-3
79
galbacɔɔ eroled juft bejbezib SJLJƐ to gisteroeë sɗT
a'questsit atk „grofgood ni beredsiger yasŋmod yas of moitostOIZ
yaitotam a Jadt" sevicamado plaidas bluoda ere:1110 zalvenoÛ
-Toerig to br#oƐ gaiysaɛk ed‡ 1i na Iløv sa stabloderade ed‡ to
Imvique to TIKĄ TOJBOTz odt täit bas „BJsetdus deisinƐ BIG STO
sott10 matetol seɛ) "dvititƐ oaís al caenteus eda ni beyo.l^me
gal..64 bæS setɛɛolɔne bau 8081 daƐl redo360 to gaixes od
.(YOGI YILUïdes disēl bas 8001 Tedmesed day to flituebita00
2011 nam:760 add tolau yfzewtot,"gasner19" .2.2 T
·
FIGE
acideoup at won si gs11 dat.itƐ alt yil os sigt eBody bas
muqmoƆ nidensetë gasasr14" edt 1o qłierenwo beduŋoz edt at si
selasquod ano-anok ent rebnu bejutoṛıconi yanqnod » "bətimi
bas egeils to beɛoquos tasques ↳ B1 BIAT
TeJTado Tebao el qiie odł .Ioïjnoj nsated telav bas esenidə
odd yd benwo szexicod s ,3moedo neuf to wait anoxgnoli wilt ot
KLATED S „Easquod bra reedel .arszek to etobsiquoƆ ezenidə
AJTON TO STтod ytsert edt et zedɔnand ddiw gnońgnok to STI?
wodioй to dzoq yibati ada od galbard need ɛad qida od .Baldo
ed to sonstsiees eit ddiw benkaddo stelt sad bns (nantal mi)
exojah bawial" as yasquod bal ndadek .atasel to regsaaki Isoof
,"stuollittSÜ
självaпoð 8*y‡zetuki siH to agrado mi TelloT-Xï#së .IM
od versate mild to ddyft adt gnisduob,(wodich) vodɔgavið js
wilɔ ddiw notjustnumico ni ased sad „auft deitizɑ edd ynt
od Testam edð bøttelet sad bas grožynok to ytadanɔeż Istmofo
BAoiJovnjani ret retainiH s'y‡setali stil
ein ni nogach to yesterseä Istnofað sᇂateveż .IM
**T6I£OT=X¶stē „TM os galyfqer at Jasť Tednejqsɛ d♪♪l to rettel
-acɔ gidans6j2 gasaɛ7dt odd to nottu‡itsnoð alls of es ceintupae
อ
pany, Limited relies on section 1 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, and on the case of R. v. Arnaud (9 Q.B. p. 806; and
L. J.
Q.B. p. 50). By the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, ship owned wholly by "Bodies corporate established under and subject to the laws of some part of His Majesty's Dominiona having their principal place of business in those Dominions
are deemed to be British ships.
H
and
·
The Company have doubtless an Office in Hongkong so conducted as to comply with the requirements of the law as to a place of business, that is to say, a place of business held
in the name of the firm where business is carried on on behalf of the firm by a person or persons in the pay of the firm, The Company have, I presume, also only one share registration
office, namely that at Hongkong.
In the case R. v. Arnaud, decided in 1864, but still the only quoted authority in the matter, it was held that a British Company incorporated in England by charter for the purpose of building purchasing and employing ships on certain specified coasts outside the Realm and also in the West Indies, was entitled to have them registered as British vessels under the then law as to the registry of vessels the property of a corporation although the individual members of the Company
might be foreigners.
Registration had in that case been resisted by the Customs Authorities and Sir F. Thesiger put forward all those arguments based on general policy and the inconvenience and impropriety of foreigners having interests in British ships which could be urged in the present case.