ہیں ل
he is strictly entitled to it in the Colony to which he is transferred. Me Irving's contention would be grossly unfair to H. Rong; he had served 10 only had 10 months Jars in FM 8.
leave;
❤
is he to be able to claim from
indefinite period, the $16
months further leave which
H. Hone, for
an
have taken from
M.S.?
I should say
he might
that question will be
in writing to for. as proposed say
referred to for: but, grant of leave to
sulget to the exigencies of the service, a
that floccoss the S. of
that he is now entitled
any
5. cannot admit
of night to
leave in respect of his previous service
Here
Ridley an as A. lasting cm
Col. Sic Way miliono
1. crenat
P
A
An
4.1.1-
that¬
Collins
5/1/14
Gen. Dept.
280
Have you any obsons on this ? My own
view is that previous service in another Colony
would ordinarily only be taken into conson in the
first grant of long leave after transfer, and
that when so taken into conson the amount of leave
given in respect of service in another Colony
should be definitely debited against such ser-
vice and not against service in the new Colony.
No further leave from the new Colony in res-
pect of service in a previous Colony would be al-'
lowed unless in very exceptional circumstances
(8.g. prolonged ill health, as in the recent case
Gen.
of Mr. Bertram, Att. of Ceylon).
Are
mr
Collins.
1. W
for
V mamajhimi
Ar
Ara
;י,ן
JM
See the minuter N2 22139
St Lucia
-02
Lave on account of precious secure in another
Coloz is not a
may be grauter
mather of right but such leave
Bd
a concession, when the
exigencies of the service permit.
Each case to be listed on it's merits att
the
seems to be the right way of dealing with such cases. Hand & fact rules won't woch. TCM. 6/1/15.