CO129-419 - Individuals - 1914 — Page 110

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

-13-

108

(土)

(7)

portion of the Tower, yet this drawing has never been received by the Government. I cite this as an instance showing the unreliability of the Architect's promises even at that date; other cases you doubtless have noticed.

In the meantime the work was progressing! Such a procedure as stated under this heading briefly explains why the third storey, which was constructed in brickwork, according to the Architect's design, had to be pulled down and an unnecessary sum of $1609.43 expended.

Full particulars are, I believe, contained in C.S.O. 7781 of the year 1905.

I beg to submit that a perusal of the C.S.O's together with the Public Works Office copies of the following files: - C.S.O. 3915/1903, C.S.O. 4083/1905, C.S.O. 7781/1905 and other subsidiary files that were introduced will suffice to show what I had to contend with owing to the system of minutes and the procedure connected therewith and the inevitable delay arising therefrom and that my actions were in the real interests of the Government, viz:- to complete the building for occupation with as little delay as possible.

It will be noted that during Mr. Chatham's absence from the Colony in the year 1909, matters were brought to a climax with the Architects.

Edit History

2026-06-25 21:05:17 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
-13-108(土)(7)portion of the Tower, yet this drawing has never been received by the Government. I cite this as an instance showing the unreliability of the Architect's promises even at that date; other cases you doubtless have noticed.In the meantime the work was progressing! Such a procedure as stated under this heading briefly explains why the third storey, which was constructed in brickwork, according to the Architect's design, had to be pulled down and an unnecessary sum of $1609.43 expended.Full particulars are, I believe, contained in C.S.O. 7781 of the year 1905.I beg to submit that a perusal of the C.S.O's together with the Public Works Office copies of the following files: - C.S.O. 3915/1903, C.S.O. 4083/1905, C.S.O. 7781/1905 and other subsidiary files that were introduced will suffice to show what I had to contend with owing to the system of minutes and the procedure connected therewith and the inevitable delay arising therefrom and that my actions were in the real interests of the Government, viz:- to complete the building for occupation with as little delay as possible.It will be noted that during Mr. Chatham's absence from the Colony in the year 1909, matters were brought to a climax with the Architects.
Baseline (Original)
-13-108(土)(7)portion of the Tower, yet this drawing has never been received by the Government. I cite this as an instance shewing the unreliability of the Architect 'a promises even at that date; other cases you doubtless have noticed.In the meantime the work was progressing! Such a procedure as stated under this heading briefly explains why the third storey, which was constructed in brickwork, according to the Archi- teot's design had to be pulled down and an unnec- essery sum of $1609.43 expended.Full particulars are, I believe, contained in 0.8.0. 7781 of the year 1905.I beg to submit that a perusal of the C.S.O's together with the Public Works Office copies of the following files;-0.8.0. 3915/1903, 0.8.0. 4083/1905, 3.8.0.7781/1905 and other subsidary files that were introduced will suffice to shew what I had to contend with owing to the system of minutes and the procedure connected therewith and the inevitable delay arising therefrom and that my actions were in the real interests of the Government, vis:- to complete the building for occupation with as little delay as possible.It will be noted that during Mr. Chatham's absence from the Colony in the year 1909 matters were brought to a climax with the Architects.
2026-06-25 21:05:17 · Baseline
View content

-13-

108

(土)

(7)

portion of the Tower, yet this drawing has never

been received by the Government. I cite this

as an instance shewing the unreliability of the

Architect 'a promises even at that date; other

cases you doubtless have noticed.

In the meantime the work was progressing!

Such a procedure as stated under this heading briefly explains why the third storey, which was constructed in brickwork, according to the Archi- teot's design had to be pulled down and an unnec- essery sum of $1609.43 expended.

Full particulars are, I believe, contained

in 0.8.0. 7781 of the year 1905.

I beg to submit that a perusal of the C.S.O's

together with the Public Works Office copies of

the following files;-

0.8.0. 3915/1903, 0.8.0. 4083/1905, 3.8.0.7781/1905

and other subsidary files that were introduced will

suffice to shew what I had to contend with owing to

the system of minutes and the procedure connected

therewith and the inevitable delay arising therefrom

and that my actions were in the real interests of

the Government, vis:- to complete the building for

occupation with as little delay as possible.

It will be noted that during Mr. Chatham's

absence from the Colony in the year 1909 matters were

brought to a climax with the Architects.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.