٠٢٢
bos,970toJered ze gnoxgnol at antuder bnu atiaoqab
gnoxgnok ni toð sið to lordnos edð od dostdua ets vent
yneqmoo unino a Jand be layb ai Ji Tevewod II
MB ledgnedƐ ni annudet bns aðiaoqeb aji sxem bivoda
edd rebnu anob atɔe revoa od (7) E elsi¿TA of noijibbe
evig of bra Vis8899en ed birrow sanamibro sometwan) ell
;(I) AI of bebbe ad bluoda ji zawoq Josib twoƆ adt
bebulɔmi ed blvoria aeɔnhibтo saerit ditod r9voa of TO
."somentbro adt" með sáð ni
erit dgwordt snob eð muɔ læsb Jasts a Jdvob oй
10 STiBeb end etsio9rqqe I Judanodynok ni menjzigeя
agineqmos daiting to y‡idory and yol aldianoqaer saont
to Jeritivt end to Iojnoɔ Jaanib evæd of amino ni
nwo Tied to bne,zsineqnoɔ dɔvs yd enoljegildo Tiedt
blow yneqrod sɔnenwarī stij amino & dɔidw no retaiger
.bedirbant ed
ni terjalşen sdtjadt rødded ad bluow JI
110 voegmoɔ a 9Niτja od rewog edd eved blvora Isdgnsde
Tol Juod emerqua edt bns asineqmos zniɗD to retaiger edd
-zigsı 9d‡ Jødt nedt zewoq alɗd for‡nos bivoda antɗ)
TedT .bedoval ed of ever ninoda gnodanol ni Tert
VI DV
ed blow Ji dɔldw qu gribitw of an BтSwoy Tedjo exa
.STON 98ipTexe of side ed of I[ew 88
JA
AUDITORS.
78
A further question has now arisen. Appended is a
copy of Section 16 of the "Companies Amendment Ordinance,
1913".
In view of the small number of possible auditors, and
the difficulty of providing for places at a distance from
Shanghai, of which the Fegistrar of Companies will have no
personal knowledge I personally think Article 9 is the most
practical solution of the question.
There is no objection in principle to the adoption
of the list system, but power must be given to the Court to
appoint a british subject outside the list when it is
necessary to do so, otherwise things may get hung up.
In either case a modification of Article 9 is wanted
to bring us into conformity with the new section.
.2 gb .H (be[Imitim])
:
.NIGL.E.II