2.1.
7
8565
379
and tedd ddrob on ever I .eas avoto e at aldi
TOI LLUV WSW betssto ben en triguodd bxo datriw,JANTS
€
to abrow Lentro edit bevolque asri eti
.easiretimtisbnt
sascent mi brwort Fade no blov bied now dɔidw,Jiig ent
2 ·C
t
e (869.q alero bas pựD÷1 1) vjisë waïev alik
to
to the 8 es untette ..I ruinedtoo brod to notatoeb
. IseggA
-97 kutte ut tot blov meed Jon devij ont bed neva
brel to badataroo brui ard as rst oa at blow JE
<
a890
tebm úkov noen over bloriensei no blorisert Teridarfw)
basi mkandroll edit to A mottoes to anotatvorg eitt
zoltarego otti eneo fain ,9981 to JoA 198V €Idstileno
Kɔ X*sob s'imot to etub edt de bro 9881 MJEI Jaugua no
koneg en vatr 99701 ni "Idequeig aɛw 2831 JaIS JauguA
sit to V slatkA TO SUJTtv yd,ILLw ali ni jiig eft of
.3891 Itaruɔt ni T810 1:sqeɩ bne entro
I ,bib,Illw er: Tebmu estund art doiwesh .11
4
istenen galvan bas,benetan Nold" adneve ert at AMING
*
'
Atasb z'bro¶ sonte beeqale agri fofdw amit edd od
enrw ubrei suent of eltid boog vitaetieq a textupos
1 sudily at betIqqs riot) moitetimil to astuted2 ent
15 satro mi bræl os [łomoŭ ni nebro end to V SISIJIA
MWEN
(8PECI)
Japan owned by British subjects) against all the world
except the Crown, and to hold them upon the charitable
trusts on which he had in fact applied their income.
See Churcher versus Martin (1889) 42 Ch.D. 312 and
Re Lacy 1899 2 Ch.149
the principle of which cases would I think apply in
the present instance.
The question has, however, been raised whether the
Crown is not entitled to the lands and personal estate
of Ford, who, in the events which happened, died
intestate and without heirs or next of kin, as an
escheat and bona vacantia respectively. Had the
property, whether real or personal, been situate in
England, there would have been no answer to the Crown's
claim, and there does not appear to have been any
Statute of Limitations applicable which would have
barred the same.
There is, however, the further question whether,
in the present case, the Crown can claim the property
either by escheat or as bona vacantia.
I will deal first with the question of escheat,
upon which it is not, I think, possible to find any
direct authority.
The