80A:
409
Blat Toi esitijosup to £120 nd‡ tua „bexlupet gide as mitow
Todoel TM tady bewo[[o],*‡eb of ņu galed to beetani „Josrtao0
doidw bodjen edt of al ti bas jottedtid moževa alt aned bad ayer
.aseti betuqalb adt în taom studiatja I Jadð betṛobs need nøf
.zattal a 'redsail .TM atuter of ged I
ad of quomod wdź evad I
.zte
+JHEVICB Jnelbedo qual
azodael .1 .8 .18
Extracts from Mr. R. J. Pischer's letter of 28th
August, 1914.
I
Σ
It was not the custom in the Public Works Department,
when the Bill of Quantities were prepared about twelve (12) years
ago to insert a special item in feet super for re-dressing work
on completion, neither is it the custom now as the Quantities
allow for stone and all labour.
TUO HODONLODJO
,exzol sildu¶ to totownia
I
x
I
x
X
The Contractor was also fully aware of the required
centering at the time he tendered for the work, and he has carried
out other works previously under a similar specification and Bill
of Quantities and no claim was made.
Other Contractors in Hongkong have done likewise
without making any additional claim.
X
X
I
X
I venture to suggest there is not a Bill of Quantities
in the department which shows a separate item for centering to
arches. Further, on perusal of the prices allowed in the Final
account it will be found that such included the cost of centering
X
I
X
I
I
It was not and is not customary in the Public Works Department of Hongkong to take labour in cutting as a separate
item.
The price of such cutting is understood to be included