F
„EIVI‚redmeved .lijks „znoxjnoś
. ૧૭મી
COPY.
bailtuƐ web vi
>>
Dog XTOW Ox Tot 000k way ovij of businong I
Fnulirtevo) onu ti ewal edy to misivoñ end na iw noitos noo mi bib
I .08 Enob on ovan yang beadetebou I knindyas voy yoy na bib
Bu bojnevang «vrdi esom de.vorið „trpos eind soy ewo eroterods
su mooe yuav Iliw anet Juú ¡gnike4 moT? Lenom erit voy anitnes
bne and chulau si animong Jontuzo I n juond brus,yibiyon ni gaÅ.......00 oð áðud og I proted si even so, del viniatres [[iw Iey end to
niaeq
(empoy vierenİ?
.JJOY .T .\ (.12)
i
Enclosure
2.
403
The remuneration to Mr. Suffiad, my Clerk.
He has assisted me in a variety of ways in pre-
-paring manuscripts, but the principal work which he has undertaken has been the typing of the Law Revision and Law Amendment Ordi- -nances. The bulk of these is portentous, and the last instalment which is now in the printers' hands is likely to be even heavier than the third (Nos. 1 and 2 of 1912). His work has not been mere typing, but it has been done under great difficulties, for the manuscripts of such work is inevitably of a most patch-work description, pieced together from time to time as corrections and amendments have been made, and he has done it intelligently, by reference to the Ordinances affected, often discovering and bring- -ing to my notice mistakes which it is impossible to avoid in work of this nature. I put the figure to which I thought he was en- -titled at 300 in my last letter: but now that the work has been
completed I think that the Council should have no difficulty in
following the precedent of the gratuity given to Sir John
Carrington's assistant, and granting him 3500 or $600. I have specially draw the Council's attention to the fact that the work on which Mr. Suffiad has been engaged has been the legislative side
of the revision, which was not undertaken by Sir J. Carrington.
to