. medĩ ni titiw dlaob ai aint
Joi Bankaus miurot ni faizejatine quodal astră „88
.quimb alið ni geniq
ni bebuloni bas beware. neeu au drow eifT
„nimadou ni wodji nitqaɔra truodas Lenit
«19Jou:ib *‡i averse tol aelit
eslic no nedodon talorio jaitðuð „dðI .oli
OS.CS ■ GI.
TOJONIJNGU of avⱭ
+
no beđeujba bru betona, nesú mun Яror Bist
.e .oli tebro moijait.:V
+
·TOJUNIJNOŬ of oub si bujxe oli
10017 bawanð et esiirtos Tatrolu zoj quo ani ladzo9.68
.870bĺ1100
. .OL TOUT) noiðnir? no betsutbo yboo1[A
.TOJONIJHO) od oub si nïdre oli
wi soroter menu noijaign) Về no oron von
HUVI DOJ 3B HUJAI "BIOJOWIA OÜ Nİ
LETEI
TONOJ90
Isnit en mi tot bewolla need and sïebx) exend no drov ed
.enoid qoure miwollot od ddiw trovan
الأمان فيز
Jest 1e of nitiwow asitta nol ynirejne)
.bejjimo neud end raque
RÈ TOJUNIJNo) of sub drwond
.semuri ainËNJË
•
„Jmwoods fanit ond ni babuloni Joll
.Toque .aby Oca oj struo... ydiansup ant
.Bİ TOJOBIN00 of sub Juuoma
Bi joritno) end ni jans of adax odsnoitroqonq en?
NOIJBİLV S.oll rebro
.SI
112 each.
No. 3404 bricks @ .112
less amount allowed.
-
381.25
340.40
Amount due to Contractor is................
13. Painting Steelwork at Manchai.
Not included in final account.
The constructional steelwork required scraping
71
...340.75.
!
and painting on arrival from England.
The value of the work done is 3440.58.
Amount due to Contractor is....
17. Cramos & Jozile doints.
..8440.58.
Joggle joints formed in frieze to Dome have been
omitted. Value 839.20.
Amount due to Contractor is.
.839.20.
21.
Lantern & Dome.
The rate allowed for the concrete forming upper portion is inadequate. The quantity is small and includes special circular and shaped mould and hoisting 120 feet.
Value of this is..
Less amount allowed.
.33.40
..20.17
22.
Amount due to Contractor is.
Lead boxes to wood principals.
$13.23.
Quantity of Copper nailing should be 279 f.r.
@.....
..24 66.96
Quantity allowed in final account
(due to error) is 179 f.r. @.................24- 42.96
Extra due to Contractor...
.824.00.
With reference to the alterations to imported tilework mentioned in Contractors' letter of 17th. October, 1913. The Contractor is now satisfied that he has not been
charged with the cost and he makes no claim in
respect of this alteration.