kit date he fled to Hik. having given the appellant
an creler
on the Commisioner of tinanu Preasing (Canton) for 250,000
& feat
Dollars in forein risks to be remitter to Shanghai
to Nanthing to be ward Military expenditure
as
The appellent presentent Mis
& received
ader
that beny Treasing
made in
the
150,000 desd
all there was
in th
The payment was
two Cheque for 100, foo dok. H.K. & Shanghai Bank. Jalan the other for so.ow dak. on thi International Bk at Caulen- These cheques
the appellant
apparents changer for chess
of
tein the.
ith Same banks an branches. He then proceeded
No Hk. where he casher thi & placed the proccess
Meques
(or most of the proceeds) a
in
banks in
H.K. banks
home.
on deposit
んこ
The International Banki
receipt for the 50,000. do. depart
was dated
Aug.
Meanahal
29
had left 14h.
the foverer
ship an lants
am.
-
auswer to
Mi
The appel.
the chay
of misappropriations in pro ceeds of these hoo cheques
V that after depositung
his own
proceeds
in
had seen the for. on
ship x. paid
Hi
he
same,
bom
in
amounts and of his our in
pooket.
As with be seen
dates of the relevant morementi of the parties refutes this
There were also statement.
Various arguments based on the attempted rebethen, from
in the proceeding the alleged errors
There
before the mazestiali. korean are
very technical in
Charaeli. The strangest pomit
ni
Ий
the appellants favour Vechnical frounds being Mi difficulty of showing
ever belonged to
Mat this
de
money Provincial fort perangtung
Page 30Page 31