227
1
I I A
- ¦ BØJ 'VE
Innest I did want juodail TIM ZABIJNİŞen --OT mais a 100. 95, IR 28 *tal na vam ni Juu maus II»m ni yinu con dien tu benaki Teajis nesto mi tiertud dans un oj Jase 10 bebuna 10° 0.11950 m anja: ilç? u Ti Jowtik mid yd berieser Naso em of
In is ittð og to Tim nd no deno las saujalo sa baban: nešto sid ena nasi tuwo. busa yami naidary to Jamaryng 261 rojnijwintub. 8 i 9 newo (2) deil 1.,IMIJOIjodi (UT) ToJewminium Ixo i110 eldung dostojni abimrod fieri ng no se yď bɛoneyba adres vé to -J1:080тų mm) .besavɔob lett, erda yemƏMİ
1
•
I bequate au od Viveront end de noijeretanien, to spotted at gynim med na yoni nanu vi mid no elaɔ ̧»q dæeretni and d♬ via blọt now
our eenol-and .Tid og dunt uð Sadruqar (TO TAJJAH Sİð stelpu o od pesú day don sva I COMUNA BAGS Juo več ni muu yaq of beakaorq bii koupelio nequ au bebow, doonil .1. Lavienodo Interes nj,birg MoiBɛim BrotiviloƐ to die...ay ni aquħda to enacionuq edt zet dans at sivil ĉ and yo amtein ya duen brin ngunde nå eforçaq svei Vɛ30 Tu Bngpazio ¿d beirtOD=
Jand suis con mà JI
ni davo beIbead I drad momal don bil e.
od Tečnos davo „nilberu. Qİ İLY
Diadnym ak anoby) ["raUOU
nau of yɔ.ɛijed od♪ ni de so einum bil I trúið but we nenol-equi
Jew ana beiðuqol sin na „Jounit. Má (InItBigBil erit to eonarİLLIG O pvisers to eamdrug tul deso ni eiqooq taguaq muti soat bevisen I
sov I Jand Joat and Del BBA 205 dood bedaju griebiliok a Tou Aquaje
mert deco zi ajeno bavisont vna (īsiņau sit ni deaɔ pilbasu
•* 18 avise : 10 as Du tới sique, Te34
NÃ ĐƠ MLIOUJn çing aid Jun saw I did dials ylimiausquat I
•
and to viu, loni eп0,70ve dolid du. siano be Iburu ore yzamijen sud
!
::
· 13wei of ar 10 somringoo ene øð di ba, nman sie NORBOL
to
ili of a
MİN VE SA78s ok.
Yu
by me has been proved to be incredible by the fact that he has been contradicted by his two Deputies in that resect and I request the Committee to seriously consider the question as to why br. Niabet should have denied knowledge of this fact. I submit that he has been actuated by ill-feeling towards me which ill-feeling I struggled hard to disclose in the course of the cross-examination of Mr. Nisbet by me but the Committee would not permit me to do so as it was of the opinion that gentleman of Mr. Nisbet's clase could not be actuated and subordinates were wrong in coming to that supposition. I admit this but with exception, if I may say so. I regret to have to refer to the question of actuation on the part of Mr. Nisbet, but it is unavoidable for the purposes of my defence as a whole bar to the money order cash.
I respectfully submit that if Er. lisbet could see his way to denying knowledge of one fact he could be assumed to be wrong in denying knowledge of other fate and the statement or statements in conection therewith should not be weighed with the same amount of confidence as if the statement or statements had not been contra- -dicted and more especially by the Assistant Heeds of Department, viz.:- his two Deputies.
Practice as to receivin fees in advance in pauper cases. This practice was created in the time of Lr. Seth about 1908 and nad been in force ever since in the Registry. It has now been sade the prastics of the Rezistry under an order of the Court in
Probate matters including payver oases and ag under considera- -tion of the Law Society of Hongkonɛ at the instance of the Registrar, Mr. Nisbet, previous to the 30th. of June last. The Registrar must have had the question of taking fees in advance in Probate matters wder his consideration for some time before he could have submitted it to the Law Society. It was undoubtedly the most wise and convenie t course in ever, respect in Frobate matters and it has been proved beyond any shadow of doubt, to be so by the fact that the Registrar himself as now adopted it under an order of the Court after my tar transfer from the Registry.
The