bunt
I think that our attitude should be if the Cabi-
net oonsider that a sum of
A
money should be
granted from Home funds for University educa-
tion in China
- a policy which the S. of S.
does not feel justified in pressing on the
Treas.
-
the S. of S. trusts and urges that
its full share of such a grant may be allocated
to the University of H. Kong.
If money is going about, we must I think
do our best to get the Colony its share.
If the Cabinet are simply considering the
question of a grant to H.Kong, I don't think
we can pour cold water on it especially in
-
view of our letter on 19658/09, to which the
Treasury response was only niggardly, or at
any rate not very generous. The neutrality
shewn in our L.F. of the 19th inst., forward-
ing the present appetal to the Treas., is the
furthest we can go in helping the Treas.
Perhaps Mr. Griffin might explain privately
to Mr. Behrens on above lines →
Jagree
ASC
28.8.13
23.1.13
The Cabinet are not inclined
04.16.8.15
362
to
to a
Chinese
give money
University out of the Boser
indemnity
аль била
or other funds, and ?
will not give anything
they
to Hong Kong
hat if money
going for education in China I think Hong Kong
has the first
claim.
في کہا ہے
k. Behren
30.8.13
ing privatel Rat
45113