was that the Military and aquire by santy
in the account
avy
land that they might brand
but that when holding sites
wou
thus acquired
the loss prabre to the Col. Gest camed by depreciation & soch bilding sites wing to restrictions appoint building sho're a change agamist the to.D. in the Account. This pro- pool W. charty be more advantageous to tho Colony (from the academic point quais [the Recount) then Sir P. May's porporal which is to have things arthry
from Invendering land without
are
iny
Gerin for depreciation [site rabire.
13. A
endit hung
The safeguards sofferted impare 5 othe
derp (29578)
an, to my mind, wholly ilusory
Experience shows that the military int ahoy assent that all the pound they and for
actually regmied & that none of the lend
their possession is no longer regained for depared
so that we get no remedy.
bus pores:
The nois which I take is that goin
Thi
— —
1
last para but one ti Collins letter on 264
29578 my that the Luvis Agreement
unfined andy
to the
with which it dult
Coils
*
did not percibe for future action: that
consequently the pevecime which sad be followed in that laid down in the S.US.
best of 1900 & purchase of all land for cash.
For ZH. May shaws the news this ingress
for ust pressing it affeces to be that it Mt. insole the Wol in undere expense.
I
sme
doubt if this is comet. We may be very that if he W.O. have pot of pony for loved they
Khumscheas silly
will
is
vaterity
huessay
is the had for
that the land
bepse they buy. When land
book entry,
The acting
ra
it
is natural that the necessity is not too closely studied. In my view the Colonial Set is not only justified in coguing hat is hound tongue clonly into the neersity of unewing (rown Law for military por prone's
Winding
there is no better
my
This ant
than by serving if the wond, will pay for it