why the Colony sh? suffer in consequence
So far as the talle
the table of "soitine potration
is concerned, it is, in my new, the Morgand
for this reason. The question of the liability Coloma's to pay for naval defence Las
Leen mixed from with the Military Contribution. But the Conclusion anived ath tong is sontodied in a deep to the Strait in 1889 (in which the Thasing M40. concured): "Indeling " with the great question of the defence of the 'Empire it is difficult to lay down any other broad principle for dividing the cost of Colomal defence except that the mother "Country undertaking the sea-defence of the "Colonies by means the story the Colonia
time to time in connexion
sofar as their mean
Snoviding for
I am ady
Thur
лине
Bom
allow respectively.
Longy
سا
which the Treamy made
defence"
one mistance in
A A
effort to get
awaral contribution that was in 18844 $ mirands from Cayton. (Plax see pp 16
207
Mo 16 M17 | Kartun N. 124 herewith), to the Ty comenced in the 1889 dass quote
above they may be taken
}
C
position
is
surrendering this
West? Therefore, I'consider, resist strongly
any attempt on the part of the Ading to mout the thin and the wedge.
OAS.
? Send copy Prof thing way that the S.ld fally] shures the MAG. 5 new
R2/1/14
? smit
Are
have
Mk furai pound
Kat
land ste gür Army por poss
mustn't be decoyed W
the military
when oth
wp contribution represents
bk whoh
defence.
May papan Colony's contribution to depan
:
ка
༥༥
5. 1.14
Sir Elenderson
Colony
Ra
57./14
7.1.14
I sutures agree. The offer of the is extrends grutious.
aboute
U 8.1.14
شم