beeansidered aport from other districts (I don't we why not) that it is not nawnath to rok to Gort to formulati times for deeling with at the frown Land held under yo years lens. He then goes to formulate some sorte scheme
an
If it is imposible to deal separably with the shite District then I think the Evo's scheme can be accepted, though I doubt if it with please the memorialists But pare 5/6) is not charly expressed. 576) provides for compensation if the (wown resumes possession
5ty says such compensation shehaly be payable if the lessee upones to accept a renewal on the
the Crown's tenno/
take it that what the for means is that
but
The 25.
the
if the (mon doesn't want to resume, In lessee doesn't want to renew on (rownistirms, then if the frown effects a there ton third party the must bisce my be compensated, but not otherwise. Wihad better find art expretty what
i meant.
-vay
Q
hazzling
Ave
this
252
In paras by the for ack; for instinction.
as to compensation to improvements.
(Say upon vorn (42) What ons said in the deep on be45798 in
that provision
البلاد
also
showing made & present
the frown from confiscating a brand thy
have the whole rake of tenants improst-
ments. That I think might taily
applied to all haves &tat.
in replying.
? Ack Kony
Jay so
that if the O.A.G. is satisfied
Ideal sepantaly
that it is impossible
with the Hill Distrit, the scheme.
ん
" considered formulated by the for mache" "fromalfated but and there the DAG. is to the interpretation clause (C) explaining what we understand by it.
And say that the principle ( non capiscation I the whole tenants' impromments at "the sad & the lease out to applied to at Crown leazes.
JR16/9/13
Ove