SIS
100
Isuguk end tu moinesɑ va madh
Jimoj.
COPY.
Enclosure 2.
243
E¿VI, nuoI,Jasol, Insel)
beɛɛi sib Isoqqa
*) vindral, DIGE tiv bum bumb slof)
.ayeb)
• BC 800 (3 LV
Seerial Inergå
njnos ffw
eftir &)
TIME WHEN MY IN atrolleys
bfend nay kJ
Jnobnoy yuz
to muitineb eik murt
.epitert teir
#10 fel rull
idit
on Ju2 of
Jhablogs: I
snj
tu mozdicab ert mori .columb feind and
horri
S Ha
Ins y
VIROL) 1. (P2+6)
Ink ves
syrel noid:tog ono :-I old ri A bajrang 837 „be nul-1 car evvel fando
.enut, .AJOI
(ash Blow 2)
hoani nik Ise, YA
.adnou de
(JEL,,MI)
-Ighiamoo zebow roll
Icriw ).emul`,IJOI) .drpo” erit to moija-
Y nex
bue und ist dori
Jobnogor
& Iss gå
to muiniuek ers mort .bicü nido end
oj nvrel Tot enoididei Gl muizioeb and moti Ineqg3 allt of two Inegga end to elson 1 3 'ra :liorüod yviri to moisibob di Mor 900 end lus,epivert, teint eru to noiriseb oris mort Terito aniocin "juayo) coiceyt
.noidolleftul Iani izo ni
no. Juria II.1.0 91 BA to Tucinifcü s divot qerqw? To moi josh wid mort sulunut leirio at
IJRIT .* . Jual focus
iJsInT
Jnobronne.
fue
IceryA
.1. To moiñineb eds „orl .rštommo") eoisduī
In regard to the drawbacks to which I alluded in
paragraph 7 of my report I must point out a further one of some
magnitude. Appeals to the Privy Council must be by leave of the
Full Court and it has been found that if the party concerned desires to appeal after a consideration of the judgment against him he has to wait until the next session of the Appeal Court i.e. some 5 months as one member of the Court is absent from the
Colony. A fortnight ago the Full Court consisting of the Puisne
Judge and myself only took upon ourselves with doubtful authority to grant a stay of execution in such a case pending the applica- -tion to the entire Full Court in its sitting in January. I have kept Sir Havilland informed of the course of the proceedings and I shall sugest to the Attorney-General, for Your Excellency's approval, the insertion of a clause in the amending bill delegat- -ing the right of granting leave to appeal to the Privy Council to two Judges only. This will remove an obvious impediment to a liti- -gant's right in getting his case heard as soon as possible by the Privy Council.
21st. July, 1913.
(Sd.) W. Rees Davies.