〃
"I see no recon
Ammended, as
why the Law and
nothe
you propose, mospectiorly atten
the Komination & the suit.
from the It. G's uport (oma) it affares that the Gust lost the case, proposed to appeal, then compromised with the apparently, tasonable
Com rang
trms.
Comparing the romance with the aft on 4/1342/09 $2 canies aut 83 1. the aft hit suits reference to a Sut dept:
This is because the deft proposed
To
upal ade 132/igre to the mesent note does not.
§3 indentical ith 34 the Ift.
$4
$5 is new
$5
& contains prosono to workmen's tickets
مد
from the D. G's report it st. seem, though it is not or stated, that the I carries out the anangement marc
with the Co. when the goot's appeal
Dosped
The Co. have
I su
a
it mas
agrud
Le no reason
217
ms
be fare sumed that
to there terms.
therefore why me and not
? me tox 27.
R26/8/13
25.26/8/13. 28/8/13.
Mb
Ave
27.8.13